A Landscape Design Process Based on Alexandrian Theory (An Iranian Academic Study)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture, Department of Environmental Design Engineering, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Landscape Design Process Based on Alexandrian Theory (An Iranian Academic Study)

نویسنده [English]

  • Mahdi Khakzand
چکیده [English]

The author in this research has tried to link the Alexander pattern language theory, which is based on human oriented and spatial factors, to landscape design, which could come to a cyclic model of “A Pattern Language for Landscape Design” in Iranian schools of architecture. So, a landscape design process based on the value of Human-Oriented approach, which is extracted from other values, and the theoretical crisis in this area is discussed in this paper. The author has called this the “Socio-Cultural” approach. Many researchers such as Alexander (1977), Hillier & Hanson (1984), Norberg- Schulz (1984), Rapoport (1998) and Fathy (2000) have debated on the position and the value of human (Socio-Cultural approach) during design activity and thinking. The purpose of this research is to achieve an academic design process for “Landscape Design” in Iran, based on Pattern Language theory. In fact, achieving such a design model seemed impossible, if no relationship was found between the mentioned theory and Landscape Design. In the end, using a comparative study, some models were achieved. The research method is a survey implemented to collect data from 129 master students of landscape architecture, studying at various schools of architecture in Tehran. The sampling method was based on the stratified random sampling. A 49-itemed questionnaire was used to collect data, where the reliability of all subscales was more than 0.80, estimated from Cronbach alpha test. Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to analyze data by the LISREL 8.72 software. Results of the analysis statistically confirmed the model of “A Pattern Language for Landscape Design”.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pattern Language
  • Landscape Design
  • Academic Design Process
  • Socio-Cultural Dimension
  • Iran

Akin, O. (1981). Teaching architecture. In: Comerio, M.C., Chusid, J.M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 69th

Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture on Teaching Architecture. Association ofCollegiate Schools of Architecture, Washington, DC, pp.16–30.

Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C. Ishikawa, S. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, M. Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, Sh. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Alexander. C. (2001, 2002, 2004 & 2005). The Nature of Order (four volumes); Book 1, The Phenomenon

of Life (2001); Book 2, The Process of Creating Life (2002); Book 3, A Vision of a Living World (2005); andBook 4, The Luminous Ground (2004). The Center forEnvironmental Structure, Berkeley, California.

Bell, S. (1999). Landscape, pattern, perception and process. Taylor & Francis; 1 edition.

Dee, C. (2001). Form and Fabric in Landscape Architecture. London and New York: First published by

Spon Press.

Fathy, H. (2000). Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt. University Of Chicago Press.

Halprin, Lawrence. (1970). The RSVP Cycles: Creative Processes in the Human Environment. George Braziller;1st edition.

Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, C. (1981). Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Ledewitz, S. (1985). Models of design in studio teaching. J. Architectural Educ. 38 (2), 2–8.

Midgley, M. (1995). Duties Concerning Islands. In R.Elliot, ed., Environmental Ethics, Oxford Readings in Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Milburn, L.S., Brown, R.D. (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, pp 47–66.

Mollison, B. and Holmgren, D. (1990). Permaculture One: A Perennial Agricultural System for Human Settlements. Tagari Publications; 5th edition.

Nasr, S. H. (2007). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis in Modern Man. Kazi Publications; Rev Sub edition.

Nassauer, J.I. (1985). Bringing science to landscape architecture. In: Stoltz, R. (Ed.), Proceedings on the

CELA Forum by Issues of Teaching and Instructional Development in Professional Education. Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, pp. 41–44.

Norberg-Schulz, Ch. (1984). Genius Loci: Towards a phenomenology of Architecture. Rizzoli.

Norberg-Schulz, Ch. (2000). Architecture: Presence, Language. Place Skira. Milan.

Pye, D. (1978). The Nature and Aesthetics of Design. London: The Herbert Press, (first published as The Nature of Design in 1964 by Studio Vista, London).

Rapoport, A. (1998). Using ‘Culture’ in Housing Design. Housing and Society, 25, No. 1/2, pp. 1–20.

Relph, E. (1981). Rational landscape and humanistic geography. London. Groom Helm.

Rosenberg, A.M., (1986). An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape Journal , 5 (2), 75–82.

Salingaros N.A. (2007). A Theory of Architecture. Publisher: ISI Distributed Titles.

Salingaros, N.A. (1999). Architecture, pattern and mathematics. Nexus network journal, 1, pp: 75-85.

Saunders, William S. (2002). A Pattern Language by Christopher Alexander (Book Reviews). New York:Oxford University Press.

Schön, D.A. (1988). Toward a marriage of artistry and applied science in the architectural design studio. J.

Architectural Educ. 41 (4), 4–10.

Seamon, D. (1993). Dwelling, seeing and designing: toward a phenomenological ecology. State university ofNew York press, Albany.

Seamon, D. (2007). Christopher Alexander and a Phenomenology of Wholeness. Annual meeting of the

Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA), Sacramento, CA, May 2007.

Spirn, A. (1998). The Language of Landscape. Yale University Press, New Haven.

Stephenson, J. (2008). The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84. pp: 127-139.

Swaffield, S. (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania press.

Thampson, Ian H. (2005). Ecology, Community and Delight: Sources of values in landscape architecture.

Published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library (second edition).

Thompson, I.H. (1998). Environmental ethics and the development of landscape architectural theory. Landscape Res. 23 (2), 175–194.

Tunnard, C. (1948). Gardens in the Modern Landscape (revised 2nd edition), London, and Scribner, New York:Architectural Press.

Turner, T. (2004). The Design methods. (Turner private website: www.gardenvisit.com). (visited: June, 2007)