Identifying Measures and Indicators Affecting the Walkability of Neighborhoods with a Sustainable Neighborhood Development Approach Case Study: Chizar Neighborhood, Tehran, Iran

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A. Graduate in Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD Candidate in Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying Measures and Indicators Affecting the Walkability of Neighborhoods with a Sustainable Neighborhood Development Approach Case Study: Chizar Neighborhood, Tehran, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razieh Rezazadeh 1
  • Laleh Latifi Oskouei 2
  • Maryam Mohammadi 3
چکیده [English]

Sustainable transportation with the aim of urban sustainable development aims to improve the environmental quality and the socio-economic condition. One of the most important strategies for achieving sustainable transportation is planning and designing for walking, or in other words increasing urban walkability. Therefore, increased walkability has become a key issue in urban planning. Understanding influential measures on urban and neighborhood walkability for residents have become very important. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to identify the factors affecting walkability in order to improve neighborhoods' sustainability from the residents’ point of view. The results of increased walkability are investigated through various social, economic and environmental aspects. This article is based on a subjective approach to define the effective measures on walkability in the case study of Chizar neighborhood in Tehran. Therefore, the article is an applied analytical one based on quantitative analysis. Based on a survey technique, 200 sample questionnaires were collected. The data then was used to conduct correlation and regression analyses. The results show that the most important factors affecting the residents’ perception of walkability include access to daily and weekly needs, sense of security and safety, environmental aesthetics, permeability and traffic characteristics.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neighborhood
  • Walkability
  • sustainable development
  • Chizar Neighborhood
  • Tehran
  • Iran

Arrington, GB. & Faulkener, T. (2002). State Wide TOD Study Factors for Success in California. TechnicalAppendix, California DT 12-19.

Bhattarai P. (2007). A GIS Based Walkability Analysis, an Independent Study. Department of Urban & RegionalPlanning, USA: University at Buffalo.

Brown et al. (2007).Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features. Environment and Behavior Journal,39, pp. 34-61.

Cerin et al. (2007a).Measuring perceived neighbourhood walkability in Hong Kong. Cities; 24, pp. 209–217.

Cerin et al. (2007b). Applying GIS in physical activity research: community ‘walkability’ and walking behaviors. Geospatial Research and Application Frontiers inEnvironmental and Public Health Systems: Development in the Asia Pacific Region. Springer Verlag. pp. 72 –89.

Edwing et al. (2006).Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Journal of

Physical Activity and Health, 3, pp. 223-240.

Frank et al. (2006).Many pathways from land use to health. Associations between neighbourhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of American Planning Association ,72, pp. 75–87.

Glanz, Theresa A. (2011).Walkability, Social Interaction, and Neighbourhood Design, A Thesis Presented to theFaculty of The Graduate College at the University ofNebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For theDegree of Master of Community and Regional Planning,Major: Community & Regional Planning, Under theSupervision of Professor Yunwoo Nam. USA: University

of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Greenberg R. and RenneJ. (2005).Where Does Walkability Matter the Most? An Environmental Justice Interpretation of New Jersey. Data . Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.82, pp. 90-100.

Kansas City Walkability Plan (2003).Measuring Walkability: Tools and Assessment, [Electronic Version].Retrieved August 23, 2009 from website: http://ww4.kcmo.org/planning.nsf/plnpres/walkability.

Kets, P.(1994)The New Urbanism Toward and architecture of community, McGraw Hill.

Leslie et al. (2005).Residents’perceptionsofwalkabilitya ttributesinobjectively different neighbourhoods: apilotstu dy. Health&Place Journal, 11, pp. 227–236.

Leslie et al. (2007).Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively

assess relevant environmental attributes. Health & Place Journal,13, pp. 111–122.

Leslie, E. and Cerin, E. (2008).Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults?Preventive Medicine, 47, pp.273–278.

Lo, R. (2009).Walkability: what is it?. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking an Urban Sustainability, 2, pp.145–166.

Mavoa et al. (2009).Measuring Neighborhood Walkability in New Zealand Cities. Centre for Social and HealthOutcomes Research and Evaluation Massey University.

Mineta Transportation Institute (2001). History of transit oriented development (TOD). [Electronic Version].Retrieved July 03, 2009 from website: http://www.transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/envisioning2/mti2001_etodp_website/TOD_

History.PDF.

Moudon et al. (2006).Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood Theoretical and Empirical Insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health ,3, pp. 99-117.

Neckerman et al. (2009).Disparities in Urban Neighborhood Conditions: Evidence from GIS Measures

and Field Observation in New York City. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, pp. 264–285.

Nieweer, S.H. (2004). Transit Oriented Development for the Greater Toronto Area, an International Policy

Perspective, University of Toronto.

NourMohammadzadeh, H. (2006).Defining aim in urban planning, Fine arts Journal, 26, pp. 27-36

Owen et al. (2007).Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian. Adults.American

Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, pp. 387-395.

Pikora et al. (2002).Developing a Reliable Audit Instrument to Measure the Physical Environment for

Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, pp. 187–194.

Pikora et al. (2003).Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinantsof walking and cycling. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1693–1703.

Pikora et al. (2006).Neighborhood Environmental Factors

Correlated with Walking near Home: Using Spaces. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 38, pp. 708–714.

Smitth, A. (2008).The Relationship Between Neighborhood Environment And Walking Behavior: The Influence Of Perceptions Dissertation for the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland.

Stevens, R.(2005). Walkability around Neighborhood Parks: An Assessment Of Four Parks In Springfield,

Oregon. Thesis for the degree of Master of Community and Regional Planning, Department of Planning, Public Policy andManagementand the Graduate School of the University of Oregon, USA.

http:// www.newurbanism.org.

http://region1.tehran.ir.

http://www.ippuc.org.br/pensando_a_cidade/index_

zoneamento_ingles.htm.

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com