عنوان مقاله [English]
Sociability of educational spaces is crucial to the quality of education because a major part of learning takes place through attending public spaces, acting in spaces, social interaction with peers, and collective life in public spaces. Sociability provides for the users’ social needs. The present study seeks to explore the development of sociability in educational spaces through increasing opportunities for social interaction in educational buildings, particularly in their shared spaces. The hypothesis is that human, activity and environmental factors stand in a significant relationship with sociability of the students at the School of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan, Iran. Underlying this study is a descriptive-analytical methodology that was applied, in form of a case study, in the School of Art and Architecture of Bu-Ali Sina University. The data were collected by using library research, interview, field observation, and case study. In so doing, a survey was performed by administering a questionnaire to the subjects, i.e. sample students from among the entire population of the students at the school. The correlation of the data was then analyzed by SPSS software and influence of each variable, on the development of sociability in educational spaces, was determined. According to the findings, from among the three variables, the psychosocial characteristics of the users, which tend to be the most influential and physical features of the public environment, are the least influential factors. Also the results of correlation tests show that psychosocial factors and physical factors are directly correlated with activity-related factors.
Chicolet, R. (1999). Theories of Comparative Politics (V. Bozorgi & A. Tayeb, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Rasa Press,
Cooper Marcus, C., & Carolyn, F. (1998). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Spaces: Van
Daneshgarmoghdam, G., Bahraini, S. H., & Eynifar, A. (2011). An Investigation on Sociability of the Spaces
Based on Perception of Nature in the Built Environment.
HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 45, 25-36.
Daneshpour, A., & Charkhchiyan, M. (2007). Public Spaces and Influential Factors on Collective Life, Bagh-e
Nazar, 7, 19-28.
Douglas, M. (2003). Urban Space in Globalization Era.
Forgas, J. (2000). Psychology of Social Interaction: Mia Behavior of the Individual (M. Firoz-Bakht & K.
Beygi. Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Mahd Publication.
Habibi, R. S. (2008). Mental Image and the Concept of Place, HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 35, 39-50.
Habibpour, K. & Safari, R. (2012). Comprehensive Manual for Using SPSS in Survey Researches. Tehran:
Hagh-Shenas, A. M. et al., (2008). Hezareh English- Persian Dictionary (13th Ed.). Tehran: Farhang Moaser.
Hall, E. T. (1982). The Hidden Dimension. New York:Anchor Books.
Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2007). Social Interaction in Urban Public Spaces. Britain: Joseph Down tree Foundation.
Hormoz, M. (1997). Background of Political Sociology: Political Sociability. Tehran, Iran: Pazhang.
Khaki, G. (2005). Research Methodology with an Approach to Thesis Writing. Tehran, Iran: Baztab Publication.
Lang, J. (2004). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design (A. Einifar, Trans.). (3rd Ed.). Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press.
Lennard & Lennard (1984). Public Life in Urban Spaces. Southampton: Godlier.
Leonard, S. (1998). Designed Urban Space and Social Life (R. Mojtaba pour, Trans.). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 44, 45.
Mardomi, K., & Ghamari, H. (2011). Influential Architectural Requirements on Sociability of Metro Stations Spaces. Urban Management, 27.
Matlabi, G. (2001). Environmental Psychology: A New Knowledge in the Service of Architecture and Urban
Design. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 10.
Moleski, W. H., & Lang, J. T. (1986). Organizational Goals and Human Needs in Office Planning, In Jean D.
Wineman (Ed.), Behavioral Issues in Office Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Osmond, H. (1957). Function as the Basis of Psychiatric Ward Design. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Pakzad, J. (2005). Guidelines of Designing Urban Space in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Payam Sima publication.
Pasalar, C. (2003). The Effects of Spatial Layout on Students’ Interactions in Middle Schools: Multiple Case Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of North Carolina State University.
Salehinia, M., & Me’marian, G. (2009). Sociability of Architecture Space. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA Architecture
and Urbanism, 40, 5-17.
Schultz, N. (2003). Architecture: Meaning and Place (V. Norouz-Borazjani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Jan-e Jahan
Publication. Sennett, R. (1974). The Fall of Public Man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Tanhaei, H. A. (2000). An Introduction to Schools and Theories of Sociology. Mashhad: Ney Negar.
Whyte, W. (1980). Social Life of Small Urban Space. Conservation Foundation.
Woolley, H. (2003). Urban Open Space. New York:Spon press.