عنوان مقاله [English]
The subject of this paper is comparative analysis of wisdom and philosophical thoughts and their effects on architecture and urban design. Wisdom and philosophical thoughts had great impacts on well-known buildings throughout the history. Artistic and architectural products are the appearance and materialized of various philosophical and wisdom thoughts, as an illustration of cultural and belief properties of nations in their history. In other words, art and architecture are historical authenticities which appear according to the influenced myths, nation’s recognition and hearts of ages. Research method of this paper is documental and descriptive- interpretative. Logical argument and quantitative analysis are used for documents and texts. Wisdom and philosophy as thoughts and west and east architecture are analysis units in this study. Results show that philosophical and wisdom had fundamental affects on forming architectures in all areas although the nature of the affects and origins of these thoughts have differences. The investigation of various philosophers’ thoughts in general and eastern ones in particular does not indicate any specific separation between these thoughts and the influences they created. The aim of this article is to study concepts of philosophy and wisdom and elaboration on the specifications of thoughts eradicated in philosophical and wisdom concepts of Principles in more details. We also try to indicate the peculiarities of art, artists, and artistic works influenced by these thoughts. These two types have differences in their aspects: attainment condition to the truth, method of attainment to the truth, conditions of attainment, affect kind on subjective, kind of value, audiences, attributes, rate of immunity, main origin, kind of perception, related knowledge, inclined perceptive kind, method of expression, recognition tool, origin source, area, kind of plan, approach, attitude, subject, method, objective, desired object. Wisdom is not a philosophy, but there is a relationship between them. As they have common parts, we can say theoretical part of wisdom and Islamic part of philosophy are the same. Regardless of human thoughts’ kinds, they are related to recognition of existence and accompanied by religious believes. So, the oldest philosophical thoughts are searchable within eastern religious thoughts. Results indicate the essential differences between philosophical and wisdom thoughts, and also artistic and architectural works in west and east, are that they are more influenced by philosophical and wisdom thoughts. Art from the viewpoint of west- east has orderly these features: art - profession, realistic- symbolic, modern- tradition, industry -craft, new science- tradition knowledge, quantitative- qualitative approach, learning techniques based on new science- learning mystery based on tradition knowledge. Features of west- east artists are: artists- craftsman, innovation based on creativity- innovation based on origins and roots, physical ability- spiritual merit, rebellion- succession of good, collective interest- individual impression, globalist- regionalist. Based on these features, artistic works in west- east world has these characters: unsacred- sacred, non –religious- religious, materialistic- spiritualistic, terrestrial –heavenly, superficial- deeply, no origin- origin, subsistence- eternal. Eastern art and architecture especially Iranian art and architecture have been affected by theology thoughts and founded on intuitional and praising experiences. Western art and architecture are appearance of philosophical thoughts and experiment and reasoning. From the viewpoint of wisdom, perception of architecture and its elements have two dimensional aspects. One dimension is materialistic appearance of architecture and the other one is recognition of spiritual, mystical and intuitional world of designers and users. In other words, any perception of this kind of art architecture is only possible by perception of heavenly and this world of artistes and audiences. Perfection architecture in each period have been affected by superior thoughts which lead fortune speech to form permanent face. In Iranian architecture, shaping of physical spaces has been affected by wisdom and philosophical thoughts in several ways. In one side, physical space has formed based on cultural context, thoughts, customs, traditions, and life values. In other side, collection of signs, symbols, concepts and images raised form myths, customs, and ideal have formed Iranian thoughts in physical spaces.
Abolghasemi, L. (2003). The Coherence of Form in Islamic Architecture. SAMT Publication. Alexander,C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M. Ingrid Fiksdahl-King, I. Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press.
Antoniades, A.C .(1992). Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Press.
Ardalan, N., Bakhtiar, L. (1973). The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. University of Chicago Press.
Avani, Gh. (1995). New Art and Religious Traditions. Quarterly of Art. No.28.
Ayatollahi, H. A. (2001). History of Art. International Publication, First Publishing.
Ayatooalhzadeh Shirazi, B. (1982). Sightseeing in Recognition of Art and Architecture of Iran. Quarterly of Art. N.1.
Bemanian, M. (2008). Wisdom of Moslems Architecture. Research Project. Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran. Iran.
Bolkhari Ghahi, H. (1995).Terminologies and Compressions in Noble Quran, The First Congress of Iran History of Architecture and Urbanism, Bam, Kerman.
Burchhardt, T. (1986). Sacred Art in East and West: Its Principles and Methods. Perennial Books. Dehkhoda, A.A. (1995). Dictionary. Tehran, University of Tehran Publishing.
Hasanzadeh Amoli, H. (2001). Mysticism and Exalted Wisdom. Qom. Alef Lam Mim Publication.
Hekmati, sh., Akhtar, K. (1995). Mental-thought, Urban-physical Space. The First Congress of Iran History of Architecture and Urbanism. Kerman (Vol. 4). Iran Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization.
Khandaghabadi, H. (2001). Eternal Wisdom. Iran Institute of Development of Knowledge and Research. Tehran. Iran.
Madadpour, M. (1995). Appearing of Spiritual Wisdom in Islamic Art. Institute of Amirkabir Publication. First Publishing.
Madadpour, M. (2008). Christian Art and wisdom Sightseeing from Faith Era to Reason Era. Tehran. Soureh Mehr. 14.
Mahvash, M. (2006). Expression of Architecture. University of Tehran. HONAR-HAYE-ZIBA, 28, 45-54.
Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (2000). Education of Philosophy. Tehran, Iran. 1, 24-91.
Mirmiran, H. (2005). A New Progress in Contemporary Architecture of Iran. Hamshahri Newspaper. No.3529.19.
Mirmiran, H. (2004). An Analysis of Sepahsalar Mosque. Hamshahri Newspaper.
Motahhari, M. (1990). Hoisting the Spirit: Discussions on the Aesthetics and Art. Hoze Honari Press.
Mousavi Hejazi, B., Pourjafar, M. R. (2002). The Effect of Iranian Art on Arts and Crafts Movement. Tehran. University of Tehran press. HONAR-HAYE-ZIBA, 12, 4-22.
Nasr, S. H. (1989). Knowledge and the Sacred. State University of New York Press.
Nasr. S. H. (2001). Religious Art, Traditional Art, Scared Art. Proceeding of Religious Art Conference. Tehran. Iran.
Norouzitalab, A. (1997). Art is Expression of Felling. University of Tehran press. HONAR-HAYE-ZIBA, 2, 45-54.
Pourjafar, M. (2004). Eternality in Urbanism. Journal of Shahrdariha, 54.
Pourjafar, M. (2008). Contemporary Life and Desirable Art. Proceeding of Art And Life. Minsitry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Press.
Pourmand, H. A. (2007). The Effect of Philosophical Thought in Iranian Contemporary Architecture. Ph.D. Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran. Iran.
Pourmand, H. A. (2010). Philosophical Approach in Studying Iranian Architecture. The International Journal of Humanities, 16 (2), 87-114
Poustindoz, M. M. (1995). Quality of Divine Architecture. Keyvan Publication. Tehran. Iran.
Rahnavard, Z. (1999). Instruction to Wisdom of Islamic Art. Tehran. University of Tehran Press. HONAR-HAYE-ZIBA, No. 4, 5
Tabarsi, A.A. (1991). Majmaolbayan. Darolmareftat. Beyrouth. Lebanon.
The Noble Quran.
Yeganeh, M., Bemanian, M.R. (2015). Fuzzy Epistemological and Methodological Compatibility with the Architecture and Urban Studies. Journal of Urban Management, 40, 313-328.
Zeymaran, M. (2005). Philosophy of Architecture and Urban Aesthetics. Hamshahri Newspaper, N. 3664,