Investigating the Effect of Tall Buildings on Tehran City Landscape

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Associate Professor of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University Of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

Tall buildings despite their different features and impacts are just defined by their height.
The main problem of defining tall buildings in cities in terms of urban landscape is that this definition
does not have an appropriate relativity, and only includes the investigation of tall buildings based on
their height. Applying the criteria for locating, architecture and height of tall buildings in cities without
considering the mutual impacts of tower and urban landscape and with relying on physical aspects and
ignoring environmental impacts of buildings has developed more problems for the appearance of cities.
In this study we investigated the factors affect the role of tall buildings on landscape of Tehran city in
Iran. In the current study, the dependent variable was the urban landscape of Tehran, and the independent
variables were related to the semantic, aesthetic and visual aspects. Accordingly, the hypotheses of this
study predict whether there is a relationship between tall buildings and urban landscape based on the
semantic, aesthetic and visual aspects. To do so, we selected northern urban views of Tehran. Statistical
population consisted of all families living in northern parts of Tehran. Of this, a sample of 168 subjects was
selected using Cochran formula. Data collection tool was a 5-point likert type questionnaire. Collected
data from participants were analyzed in SPSS software. According to the results, tall buildings of urban
landscape of Tehran have a moderate status. From the perspective of people, the strongest effects of such
buildings are respectively related to four factors of meaning, scale, view and identity.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Effect of Tall Buildings on Tehran City Landscape

نویسنده [English]

  • Ali Yaran
Associate Professor of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University Of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Tall buildings despite their different features and impacts are just defined by their height.
The main problem of defining tall buildings in cities in terms of urban landscape is that this definition
does not have an appropriate relativity, and only includes the investigation of tall buildings based on
their height. Applying the criteria for locating, architecture and height of tall buildings in cities without
considering the mutual impacts of tower and urban landscape and with relying on physical aspects and
ignoring environmental impacts of buildings has developed more problems for the appearance of cities.
In this study we investigated the factors affect the role of tall buildings on landscape of Tehran city in
Iran. In the current study, the dependent variable was the urban landscape of Tehran, and the independent
variables were related to the semantic, aesthetic and visual aspects. Accordingly, the hypotheses of this
study predict whether there is a relationship between tall buildings and urban landscape based on the
semantic, aesthetic and visual aspects. To do so, we selected northern urban views of Tehran. Statistical
population consisted of all families living in northern parts of Tehran. Of this, a sample of 168 subjects was
selected using Cochran formula. Data collection tool was a 5-point likert type questionnaire. Collected
data from participants were analyzed in SPSS software. According to the results, tall buildings of urban
landscape of Tehran have a moderate status. From the perspective of people, the strongest effects of such
buildings are respectively related to four factors of meaning, scale, view and identity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tall Buildings
  • Urban landscape
  • Semantic
  • Visual Impact
  • Meaning
  • Tehran City

Barthes R. (1970). The Empire of Signs. New York:

Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Baumgarten, A. G. (2007). Ästhetik, (Dagmar

Mirbach, ed. and trans.). Hamburg: Meiner.

Bishop, I. D. (1997).Testing Perceived Landscape

Colour Difference Using the Internet. Landscape and

Urban Planning, 37, 187- 196.

Capon, D.S. (1999). Architectural Theory: The

Vitruvian Fallacy. New York: Wiley.

Daniel, T. (2001). Whither Scenic Beauty? Visual

Landscape Quality Assessment in the 21st Century,

Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 567-281

Duda, R. O., Hart P. E. (1972).Use of the Hough

Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures.

Communications of the ACM, 15, 11-15.

Greater London Authority (2009). Draft Revised

Supplementary Planning Guidance: London View

Management Framework SPG: The London Plan (Spatial

Development Strategy for Greater London). UK: Greater

London Authority.

Gross M. (1991). The Analysis of Visibility of

Environmental Interactions between Computer Graphics,

Physics, and Physiology. Computers and Graphics, 15,

407- 415.

Health, T., Smith, S.G., Lim, B. (2000). Tall Buildings

and the Urban Skyline: the Effect of Visual Complexity

on Preferences, Journal of Environment and Behavior,

32(4), 54-556.

Jamalpour, B. (2005). Use of Semiotics in Urban

Planning. Journal of Fine Arts, 24, 45-54.

Keller, S. (1988). Review. Contemporary Sociology.

17(3), 346-348.

Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The

Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design.

Van Nostrand Reinhold Press

Lonard, R. (2000). Aethetic Order- A Philosophy of

Order. Beauty and Art, 1st edition, London: Rutledge

Press.

Mansouri, S.A. (2000). Educational Pamphlets of

Aesthetics. M.S thesis, University of Tehran, Iran.

McAndrew F.T. (1993). Environmental Psychology.

Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing

Morris, C.W. (1971). Writings on the General Theory

of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.

Naser, J.L., Lmeokparia, T., Tiwari, R. (2001).

Skyline Entropy, Order and Preference. (Working Paper).

Ohio State Universities, Department of City and Regional

Planning Columbus, OH, US.

Nohl, W. (2001). Sustainable Landscape Aesthetics,

Perception-Preliminary Refection on Landscape

Aesthetics. Landscape and Planning, 54(1-4), 223-237.

Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P.

H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana:

University of Illinois.

Rod, J. K., and Van Der Meer, D. (2009). Visibility

and Dominance Analysis: Assessing a High-Rise Building

Project in Trondheim. Environment and Planning B:

Planning and Design, 36, 698-710.

Stamps, A.E. (2002). Fractals, Skylines, Nature and

Beauty. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning,

60(3), 163-184.

Santayana, G. (1995). The Sense of Beauty. Being the

Outlines of Aesthetic Theory. New York: Modern Library.

Zacharias, J. (1999). Preferences for View Corridors

through the Urban Environment. Journal of Landscape

and Urban Planning, 43(4), 217-225.