عنوان مقاله [English]
In the process of time perception, humans continually try to find the link between the past,
present, and future periods. This matter becomes more important, when one tries to understand the events
and their outcome; both in the daily dialogue of humans and in the critical encounter with history. Truly,
how much do the current events affect our reading of the future? Or, to what extent can our expectation
from the future change the interpretation of past events? Thinking about such issues further illustrates
the importance of the concept of time. This article will answer the question: “What is the relationship
between the various types of concept of time in the daily life of the students and the definition that they
have achieved in the academic environment?” Our assumption is: “Although the patterns of daily behavior
of students can be the same, but the acquired commentary of architecture students to the concept of time
is different from each other; due to learning in architecture.” Also, the statistical population in this study
is the architecture students, and the architecture students of Qazvin Islamic Azad University (QIAU)
have been selected as a sample population. In the process of writing, first, the data collected in a logical
reasoning method determine the theoretical framework of the article; and then the research findings are
obtained with a survey approach and the questionnaire. Based on the results obtained, although the daily
life of architectural students demonstrates the high role of linear conception, the multi-active concept of
time has the highest impact on their critical view of architectural narratives, and on the student’s acquired
commentary. Such an approach leads students to a complex understanding of historical narratives.
A. Sorokin, P. (1927). A Survey of the Cyclical
Conceptions of Social and Historical Process. Social
Forces, 6(1), 28-40.
Anad, M.Y. Kgali, B. A. (2007). Measurement of
Time. Physics Education, 277-284.
Braudel, F. (1982). On History. (S. Matthews, Trans.).
University of Chicago Press.
Bunnag, A. (2017). The Concept of Time in
Philosophy: A Comparative Study between Theravada
Buddhist and Henri Bergson’s Concept of Time from
Thai Philosophers’ Perspectives. Kasetsart Journal of
Social Sciences. 1-7.
C. Carlson, J. (1978). Social Change: A Critical
Analysis. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the
Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master
of Arts, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
D. Lewis, R. (2010). When Cultures Collide. Third
Edition Leading across Cultures, Nicholas Brealey; 3th
edition. 1st in 1996
Feeney, D. (2007). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time
and the Beginnings of History. University of California
Groys, B. (2009). Comrades of time. e-flux; Journal
#11. Link: http://www.e-flux.com/journal/11/61345/
Habibpur, K. Safari, R. (2009). Comprehensive SPSS
Application Guide in Survey Research (Quantitative Data
Analysis). Loye Publisher, 2nd Edith.
Hafez-Nia, M. (2012). An Introduction to the Research
Method in Humanities. Samt Publisher, 18th Edit.
Hammer, E. (2011). Philosophy and Temporality from
Kant to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Helleloid, E. (2014). Hannah Arendt’s Phenomenology
of the Will: Contingency, Temporality, and the Nature
of Moral Judgment. A Dissertation Submitted to the
Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial;
Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of
Philosophy; Athens, Georgia.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in Language. Psychology
Klein, W., & Li, P. (2010). The Expression of Time
(The Expression of Cognitive Categories). De Gruyter
Mouton, 3th edition
Šubrt, J. (2001). The Problem of Time from the
Perspective of the Social Sciences. Czech Sociological
Review, 9(2), 211-224.
T. Gilderhus, M. (2009). History and Historians A
Historiographical Introduction. Pearson Pub; 7th edition
Tomich, D. (2011). The Order of Historical Time: The
Longue Durée and Micro-History. Almanacka, 2, 52-65.