Defining Neighborhood, Analysis of Two Different Approaches: Expert-oriented Approach of Theorists and Perceptual Approach of Residents

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. Student of Urban Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Urban Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

The different offered definitions of “Neighborhood Unit” in various approaches and
viewpoints by different specialized views, on the one hand; and excessive attention to expert-oriented
and reduced viewpoints as well as neglecting residents’ perception of the neighborhood on the other hand
necessitate providing a complete and exact definition of neighborhood which can cover all approaches
and viewpoints. Therefore, this paper applied the content analysis research method – descriptive content
analysis- to analyze the numerous important neighborhood definitions meticulously. It scrutinizes two
different approaches, specialized views (expert-oriented) and the perceptual approach (resident-oriented)
in order to extract the most appropriate and repeated indicators, and finally introduce a comprehensive
definition of neighborhood according to these indicators. Result show significant differences exist
between neighborhood characteristics according to the definitions given by experts, famous theories
and perceptual understanding of residents. For instance the definitions of neighborhood center(s), land
uses, boundaries of neighborhood and etc. were used to derive the final appropriate indicators obtained
from both approaches. The indicators are: neighborhood boundaries including streets and traffic roads;
natural elements and social distinctions such as racial or ethnical distinctions; neighborhood area as it
is perceptible for residents (50-500 acres); neighborhood land use (providing daily and weekly needs,
appropriate access); economic- social homogeneity (social class, and income level of residents, land
value); social interaction (social relations and residents’ participation); and semantic and particular
symbols of neighborhood (natural and historical characteristics and neighborhood meanings).

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Defining Neighborhood, Analysis of Two Different Approaches: Expert-oriented Approach of Theorists and Perceptual Approach of Residents

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khashayar Emadi 1
  • Ali Ghaffari 2
1 Ph.D. Student of Urban Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Urban Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The different offered definitions of “Neighborhood Unit” in various approaches and
viewpoints by different specialized views, on the one hand; and excessive attention to expert-oriented
and reduced viewpoints as well as neglecting residents’ perception of the neighborhood on the other hand
necessitate providing a complete and exact definition of neighborhood which can cover all approaches
and viewpoints. Therefore, this paper applied the content analysis research method – descriptive content
analysis- to analyze the numerous important neighborhood definitions meticulously. It scrutinizes two
different approaches, specialized views (expert-oriented) and the perceptual approach (resident-oriented)
in order to extract the most appropriate and repeated indicators, and finally introduce a comprehensive
definition of neighborhood according to these indicators. Result show significant differences exist
between neighborhood characteristics according to the definitions given by experts, famous theories
and perceptual understanding of residents. For instance the definitions of neighborhood center(s), land
uses, boundaries of neighborhood and etc. were used to derive the final appropriate indicators obtained
from both approaches. The indicators are: neighborhood boundaries including streets and traffic roads;
natural elements and social distinctions such as racial or ethnical distinctions; neighborhood area as it
is perceptible for residents (50-500 acres); neighborhood land use (providing daily and weekly needs,
appropriate access); economic- social homogeneity (social class, and income level of residents, land
value); social interaction (social relations and residents’ participation); and semantic and particular
symbols of neighborhood (natural and historical characteristics and neighborhood meanings).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neighborhood Definition
  • Expert approach
  • Perceptual Approach
  • Residents Definitions
  • Specialists Definitions

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977).

A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction.

Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., Holden, G., Shearer,

H., & Shutter, L. (2017). The Spatial Dimensions of

Neighborhood: How Older People Define It. Journal of

Urban Design, 22(5), 547-567.

American Planning Association. (2006). Planning

and Urban Design Standards. Hoboken. NJ: Wiley.

Bailly, P.C. (1959). An Urban Elementary School

for Boston. Cambridge. MA: Massachusetts Institute of

Technology.

Banergee, T., & Bear, C.W. (1984). Beyond the

Neighborhood Unit, Resident Environment and Public

Policies. New York: Springer Science.

Calthrope, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis:

Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New

York: Princeton Architecture Press.

Campbell, L., Robitaille, E., Riva, M., & McLaren,

L. (2009). Subjective Construction of Neighborhood

Boundaries: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Four

Neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(4), 416-

490.

Chaskin, R.J. (1997). Perspectives on Neighborhood

and Community: A Review of the Literature. The Social

Service Review, 77(4), 521–47.

Cooke, P. (1980). Localities, the Changing Face of

Urban Britian. London: Unwin Hyman.

Coulton, C.J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001).

Mapping Residents’ Perceptions of Neighborhood

Boundaries: A Methodological Note. American Journal

of Community Psychology, 29(2), 371-384.

Cowan, R. (2005). The Dictionary of Urbanism.

London: Street Wise Press.

Engstrom, R., Ofiesh, C., rain, D., Jewell, H., &

weeks J. (2013). Defining Neighborhood Boundaries for

Urban Health Research in Developing Countries: A Case

Study of Accra, Ghana. Journal of Maps, 9(1), 36-42.

Farr, D. (2007). Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design

with Nature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Flowerdew, R., Manley, D. J., & Sabel, C. (2008).

Neighborhood Effects on Health: Does It Matter Where

You Draw the Boundaries?. Social Science and Medicine,

66, 1241–1255.

Galster, G. (2001). On the Nature of Neighborhood.

Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111-2124.

Galster, G.C., & Garry W.H. (1982). The Social

Neighborhood an Unspecified Factor in Homeowner

Maintenance?. Urban Affairs Review, 18 (2), 235–54.

Gharshi, M., Azkia, M., & Mahdavi, M.S. (2016).

Sociological Redefinition of the Concept of Neighborhood

from the Residents’ Viewpoint: A Phenomenological

Study of Kan Neighborhood in District 5 of Tehran,

Journal of Community Development (Rural and Urban

Communities), 7(2), 221-240.

Gibbs, R.J. (2011). Principles of Urban Retail

Planning and Development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Gould, J., & Kolb W.L. (1964). A Dictionary of the

Social Sciences. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

Grant, J. (2006). Planning the Good Community: New

Urbanism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Guest, A., & Lee, B.A. (1984). How Urbanites Define

their Neighborhood. Population and Environment, 7(1),

32-57.

Habibi, M., & Masaeli, S. (1999). Per Capita of

Urban Land Uses. National Organization of Land and

Housing Publication, Tehran, Iran.

Haeberle, S.H. (1988). People or Place: Variations

in Community Leaders’ Subjective Definitions of

Neighborhood. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 616–634.

Haney, W.G., & Knowles, E.C. (1978). Perception of

Neighborhoods by City and Suburban Residents. Human

Ecology, 6, 201–214.

Hart, C.H., & Waller, J. (2013). Neighborhood

Boundaries and Structural Determinants of Social

Disorganization: Examining the Validity of Commonly

Used Measures. Western Criminology Review, 14(3), 16-

33.

Hoppenfeld, M. (1967). A Sketch of the Planningbuilding

Process for Columbia, Maryland. Journal of the

American Institute of Planners, 33(6), 398–409.

Kallus, R., & law-yone, H. (2000). What is the

Neighborhood? The Structure and Function of an Idea.

Environment and Planning (Planning and Design), 27,

227-245.

Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The Significance

of Neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103-2110.

Keller, S. (1968). The Urban Neighborhood: A

Sociological Perspective. New York: Random House.

Kitchen, R., & Blades, M. (2002). The Cognition of

Geographic Space. London: Tauris & Co.

Lebel, A., Pampalon, R., & Villenueve, P.V. (2007). A

Multi-perspective Approach for Defining Neighbourhood

Units in the Context of a Study on Health Inequalities in

the Quebec City Region. International Journal of Health

Geographic, 6(27), 110-125.

Lee, B.A., & Campbell, K.E. (1997). Common

Ground? Urban Neighborhoods as Survey Respondents

See them. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 922–936.

Lupton, R. (2003). Neighborhood Effects: Can We

Measure Them and Does It Matter? London: Centre

for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of

Economics.

Marans, R.W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward

an Understanding of Community Satisfaction. In: A.

Hawley, A., & Rock, V. (Eds.), Metropolitan America in

Contemporary Perspective, 299-352.

Martin, D.G. (2003). Enacting Neighborhood. Urban

Geography, 24(5), 361–85.

Minnery, J., Knight, J., Byrne, J., & Spencer, J.

(2009). Bounding Neighborhoods: How Do Residents

Do It?. Planning Practice and Research, 24(4), 471-493.

Orford, S., & Leigh, C. (2014). The Relationship

between Self-reported Definitions of Urban Neighborhood

and Respondent Characteristics: A Study of Cardiff.

Urban Studies, 51(9), 1891–1908.

Park, Y., & Rogers, G.O. (2014). Neighborhood

Planning Theory, Guidelines, and Research: Can Area,

Population, and Boundary Guide Conceptual Framing?

Journal of Planning Literature, 30(1), 18-36.

Perchoux, C., Chaix, B., Broundeel, R., & Kestens,

Y. (2016). Residential Buffer, Perceived Neighborhood,

and Individual Activity Space, New Refinement in the

Definition of Exposure Areas- the Record Cohort Study.

Health and Place, 40, 116-122.

Rivlin, L.G. (1987). The Neighborhood, Personal

Identity, and Group Affiliations. Human Behavior

and Environment, Advances in Theory and Research,

Neighborhood and Community Environments, New

York.

Roosa, M.W., White, M.B.R., Zeiders, K.H., & Tein,

J.Y. (2009). An Examination of the Role of Perceptions

in Neighborhood Research. Journal of Community

Psychology, 37(3), 327–341.

Seghatoleslami, A. (2012). The Concept Neighborhood

in Contemporary Iranian Cities (with Analyzing Residents

‘Cognitive Maps). Mashhad, Iran: Sokhangostar

Publication.

Seghatoleslami, A., & Aminzade, B. (2009).

Analytical Approach to Recognition of Neighborhood

Concept in Contemporary Cities of Iran; Case Study in

Mashhad. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA Journal, 39, 81-92.

Spreiregen, P., & De Paz, B. (2006). Pre-design.

Chicago, IL: Kaplan Architecture Education.

Stephenson, B. (2002). The Roots of the New

Urbanism: John Nolen’s Garden City Ethic. Journal of

Planning History, 1(2), 99–123.

US Green Building Council. (2006). LEED for

Neighborhood Developments. Washington, DC: U.S.

Green Building Council.

Vidyarthi, S. (2010). Inappropriately Appropriated or

Innovatively Indigenized? Neighborhood Unit Concept

in Post-Independence India. Journal of Planning History,

9(4), 260-276.

Walters, D., & Brown L.L, (2004). Design First,

Design- based Planning for Communities. Oxford:

Architectural Press.