Historical Interruption and Continuity Attitude in Recent Changes in Architecture of Historical Iranian Fabrics

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Architecture and Conservation, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Architecture and Conservation, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

Review and continuation of the physical evidence can be pursued over a long period in Iranian architecture; however, the architecture of modernity occurred in  persistence of Iranian architecture. The past architecture and discontinuity can be the factors deemed to avoid identity. Facing tradition against contemporary ideas is now a challenge in many primeval countries. Lack of intimacy and compliance has grown up so that fewer ones can establish a logical architectural connection with the past. Gaps in the historical structures are often visible all over the country. This paper is examining the historical break in the continuum or dimension of the recent historical contexts relying on the opinion of experts in this field. For this purpose, two different concepts are studied to achieve the new categories available in the recent events of the last six decades. The questions in this research are as follows: a. Have the experts named the recent developments in architecture of historical context and to what extent do they believe in discontinuity or break? b. What are the categories available about the issue of continuity and stability in the two historical contexts? Based on the research methodology, this article is a comprehensive review of the existing resources and library records in case of historical break or continuum. After summing up the new categories, for providing reliable data, resulted survey and reports were amended by interviewing the experts.  Snowball sampling method was used in this research.  At first, experts were divided into three groups according to their opinions. The first two groups believe that discontinuity and deviance is happening in the last decade but the third groups believe this is related to the all-historical periods.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Historical Interruption and Continuity Attitude in Recent Changes in Architecture of Historical Iranian Fabrics

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamreza Japalaghi 1
  • Asghar Mohammad Moradi 2
  • Gholam Hossein Memarian 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Architecture and Conservation, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor of Architecture and Conservation, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Review and continuation of the physical evidence can be pursued over a long period in Iranian architecture; however, the architecture of modernity occurred in  persistence of Iranian architecture. The past architecture and discontinuity can be the factors deemed to avoid identity. Facing tradition against contemporary ideas is now a challenge in many primeval countries. Lack of intimacy and compliance has grown up so that fewer ones can establish a logical architectural connection with the past. Gaps in the historical structures are often visible all over the country. This paper is examining the historical break in the continuum or dimension of the recent historical contexts relying on the opinion of experts in this field. For this purpose, two different concepts are studied to achieve the new categories available in the recent events of the last six decades. The questions in this research are as follows: a. Have the experts named the recent developments in architecture of historical context and to what extent do they believe in discontinuity or break? b. What are the categories available about the issue of continuity and stability in the two historical contexts? Based on the research methodology, this article is a comprehensive review of the existing resources and library records in case of historical break or continuum. After summing up the new categories, for providing reliable data, resulted survey and reports were amended by interviewing the experts.  Snowball sampling method was used in this research.  At first, experts were divided into three groups according to their opinions. The first two groups believe that discontinuity and deviance is happening in the last decade but the third groups believe this is related to the all-historical periods.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Continuity Attitude
  • Interruption Attitude
  • Historical Cities
  • Contemporary and History Relationship

مراجع

Ahmadi, B. (2002). Structure and Hermeneutics. Gameno Publishing, 2nd Edition, spring, Tehran, Iran.
Afshar Naderi, K. (1995). A Critique of the Theoretical Foundations of the Iranian Academies Project. Architecture and Urbanism Journal, 30- 36.
Banimasoud, A. (2010). Iran Contemporary Architecture. Architecture Art Century Publication, Tehran, Iran.
Christopher, A. (2002). The Timeless Way of Building. (M. Qayyoomi Bidhendi, Trans.). SBU University, Tehran, Iran.
Ebrahimi, S., & Eslami, G.R. (2010). Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran during the Transition Period. Hoviatshahr Journal, 4(6), 3-14.
Fazeli, N. (2011). From the Obsessional Community to the Experience of Several Centuries, Studying Different Perspectives on the Continuity of Historical Experiences in Iran. Nasim-E-Bidari Journal, 20, 53- 55.
Gideon, Z. (2011). Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. (M. Mozayyani, Trans.). Scientific and Cultural Publication, Thirteenth Edition, Tehran, Iran.
Hojjat, I. (2006). The Impact of Land Reform on the Shape of Villages in Iran. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, 26, 75-84.
Hojjat, I., & Aghalatifi,  A. (2008). Cultural Architecture Education. Third Conference on Architectural Education. Architecture Faculty, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
Khadir, M. (2011). Memories that are not Memorized; why do not we Take Histories and Memories to Accumulate Historical Experiences? Nasim-E-Bidari Journal, 20.
Memarian, G.H. (2008). Transition in Architectural Theoretical Foundations. Soroush Danesh Publication, Third Edition, Tehran, Iran.
Memarian, G.H. (2014). Architectural Design Basis. Naghmeh Nawandish Publication, Tehran, Iran.
Mirinejad, S. (2013), Romanticism in Iranian Contemporary Architecture. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, 18 (1), 91-102.
Moazzami, M. (2013). Contemporary Iranian Architecture: Short-Term Society, Short Term Architecture. Firooze-Ye-Eslam Journal, 1(1), 91- 116.
Mohammad Moradi, A. (1989). A Particular Attitude to Ancient Culture as a Cultural Heritage. The Conference Continuation of Life in the Iran Old Towns, Architecture and Urban Design Faculty, IUST, Iran.
Mohammad Moradi, A. (2017). In-Person Interview.Architecture and Urban Design Faculty, IUST, Iran.
Mokhtari, E. (2011). The Heritage of Iranian Modern Architecture. Cultural Research Office, Tehran, Iran.
Moravej Torbati, K., & Poornaderi, H. (2013). Investigation of the Continuity of Effective Traditions in the Formation of Khaju Bridge based on the Comparative Study of Historical Bridge of Isfahan. Baghe-E Nazar Journal, 10(27), 61- 70.
Naghizade, M. (1998), Islamic City Attributes in Islamic Texts. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, 4-5, 47-61.
Nazif, H. (2013). Sustainability of Iranian Architectural Organs during the Transition from Islamic Era. Baghe-E Nazar Journal, 10(24), 57- 68.
Rajabi, P. (1976). Iranian Architecture in Pahlavi Era. National University of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Rezagholi, A. (1994). Sociology of Autocracy: Sociological Analysis of Zahak Mardosh. Nei Publication, Tehran, Iran.
Saremi, A. (1989). The Reconstruction of the Past Architecture and Rebuilding the Inspiration from the Past. The Conference Continuation of Life in the Iran Old Towns, Architecture and Urban Design Faculty, IUST, Iran.
Sobatsani, N. (2014). Introduction to Some Factors Affecting Contemporary Iranian Architecture between 1941- 1978. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 6(11), 49- 60.
Tavakoli, A.R. (2010). Investigation of Continued Indices in Explaining the Identity of the Laleh-Zar of Tehran. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3, 70-77.
معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر
دوره 12، شماره 26
خرداد 1398
صفحه 51-59

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 آبان 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 18 آذر 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 03 دی 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار