Analyzing the Relationship between Spatial Structure and Legibility in Administrative Buildings using Space Syntax Method; Case Study: Administrative Buildings of the Fourth post-Iranian Revolution Decade

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jundi-Shapur-University of Technology, Dezful, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Jundi-Shapur University of Dezful, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In each era, the Iranian architecture has provided a specific construction style and method. The Iranian architecture underwent some changes and transformations after the Iranian Revolution. Legibility is an important element in architectural spaces, and plays an effective role in the efficiency and quality of administrative spaces due to the public referral to these buildings. Since architectural books have investigated the contemporary Iranian architecture and the buildings constructed in Iran before 2009, and recently, numerous notable buildings have been built, current study aims to investigate the spatial structure of the administrative buildings designed by the young and modernist architects of the last decade (2010-2020). The main research question is “what are the structural features considered for the legibility of administrative spaces designed by the modernist architects of the fourth post-revolution decade?” Spatial structure is analyzed using the space syntax method in Depthmap and AGRAPH software. This method is used to interpret the relationship between the connectivity and integration in the plans. The results of data analysis indicate that legibility is significantly correlated with visibility, the natural movement of space users, space depth, and integration. It seems that modernist architects have more used three types of spatial structures including radial, centralized, and grid spatial structures with highest legibility in spaces designed with the radial structure. In this type of design, the creation of deep space is minimized and subsequently, visibility,  the movement of space users, and space integration are increased. Generally, this structure has paid enough attention to the legibility of the administrative space to meet the architectural needs.

Keywords


Abbaszadegan, M. (2002). Space syntax method in the urban design process. Urban and rural management, 9, 75-64. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20101109192703-6.pdf
Azimi Hassanabadi, A., & Ghahari, S. A. (2014). Thought of Contemporary Iranian Architects 2. Tehran: Farhang Saba.
Bavar, S. (2010). A View on the Emergence of New Architecture in Iran. Tehran: Faza Publishing.
Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. London: Architectural Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Responsive_Environments.html?id=pMCjgvyPOYQC
Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organisational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business System, 1(1), 1-20. https://www.ijecbs.com/January2011/N4Jan2011.pdf
Faisal Sultan, M., Raghib Zafar, M., & Anila. (2016). Office Design and its impact on employees’ productivity: evidence from the Banks from Karachi. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(6), 335-342. http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0616/ijsrp-p5446.pdf
Kamalipour, H., Memarian, Gh. H., Feizi, M., & Mousavian, M. F. (2012). Formal composition and spatial configuration in indigenous housing: A comparative comparison of guest space zoning in traditional houses in Kerman. Housing and rural environment. 31(138), 16-3. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=167075
Koseoglu, E., & Erinsel Onder, D. (2001). Subjective and objective dimention of spatial Legibility Social and Behavioral Science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1191-1195. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811020568
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge Mass: The Technology Press & Harvard University Press. https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1960_Kevin_Lynch_The_Image_of_The_City_book.pdf
Mirmiran, S. H. (1999). A new trend in today's Iranian architecture. urban architecture, 50 and 51, 1-4. https://bayanbox.ir/view/7140058963009548892/53.pdf
Montello, D. R. (2007). The Contribution Of Space syntax To a Comprehensive Therory Of Enviromental Psychology. 6th International space syntax symposium. Istanbul, 1-12. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.509.3933
Namdari, M. R., & Karbasi, A. (2017). Investigating the relationship between outside view of rooms and configuration of office spaces on employees' satisfaction with the desirability of these spaces: Case Study: District 1 municipality building. Seffeh Publishers, 27(79), 19-35. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=356531
Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2003). Space syntax based agent simulatin. Bartlett school of graduate studies, London . 1-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32884789_Space_Syntax_Based_Agent_Simulation
Pirbabaei, M. T., & Maleki, M. (2009). Factors affecting the desirability of administrative workspace. Fine Arts (Architecture and Urbanism), 1(40), 70-61. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_68360.html
Soltani, S., & Khaki, A. (2014). Study of legibility in workspace using analytical method of space syntax: Case study: Administrative building in the pre-construction stage. National Conference on New Theories in Architecture and Urban Planning, 1, 12-1. https://www.sid.ir/fa/seminar/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=17500
Zhang, L., Chiaradia, A., & Zhuang, Y. (2013). In the intelligibility maze of space syntax: A space syntax analysis of toy models, mazes and labyrinths. Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, Seoul, Sejong University, 1-18. http://sss9sejong.or.kr/paperpdf/scb/SSS9_2013_REF082_P.pdf