The Influence of Courtyard on the Formation of Iranian Traditional Houses Configuration in Kashan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

“Central courtyard” is an integral part of traditional Iranian houses. In most traditional houses, at least one courtyard can be identified which has been hierarchically located in the entrance of the house and organizes its other spaces. Houses with such spatial system are called “courtyard houses”. Though the design and construction of such houses have been rendered obsolete for many years, many efforts have been made by researchers in the architecture area to take advantage of the social logic of these houses’ spaces due to their proper response to the needs of Iranian life over a long period of time. But it has always led to the shape imitation, and ultimately the design has not been consistent with the needs of today’s life. It seems that recognizing the space syntax of Iranian houses and the application of this logic in today’s design lead to the formation of a genotype containing genes of previous generations, while at the same time is consistent with the appearances and needs of today’s life. Using graph theory and space syntax and justified plan graph (JPG), this paper sought to investigate the spatial influence of the courtyard on the formation of traditional Iranian houses configuration. In fact, the research question is: what is the difference between the spatial influence of the courtyard and other spaces? In this research, four houses belonging to different historical periods are randomly selected in a specific city such that all four houses have one and only one courtyard. The convex map and justified plan graph and, finally, the mathematical analysis of these samples show the impact of each of the spaces of a house on its spatial organization. The courtyard-related data shows the special impact of this space on the formation of traditional Iranian houses configuration compared to other spaces

Keywords

References

Alexander, C. (1966). A City is Not a Tree. Portland: Sustasis Press.
Bafna, S. (1999). The Morphology of Early Modernist Residential Plans: Geometry and Genotypical Trends in Mies Van Der Rohe’s Designs. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Space Syntax, 1, 01-12.
Bafna, S. (2003). Space Syntax: A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytical Techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013916502238863
Dailamann, H. (1987). Living in Cities. Stuttgart: Karlkramerverlag.
Dovey, K. (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London: Rout ledge.
Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power. London: Rout ledge.
Farokhyar, H. (2013). 100 Houses, 100 Plans. Kashan: Islamic Azad University press.
Hanson, J. (1998). Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
Hillier, B., & Tzortzi, K. (2006). Space Syntax: The Language of Museum Space. Companion to Museum Studies, 282-301. London: Blackwell. 
Klarqvist, B. (1993). A Space Syntax Glossary. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 6(2),11-12. https://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/download/778/722
Major, M.D., & Sarris, N. (1999). Cloak and Dagger Theory: Manifestations of the Mundane in the Space of Eight Peter Eisenman Houses. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Space Syntax1, 20.1-20.14.
Marcus, T. (1987). Buildings as Classifying Devices. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140467
Markus, T. (1993). Buildings and Power. London: Rout ledge. 
Osman, K.M., & Suliman, M. (1994). The Space Syntax Methodology: Fits and Misfits. Architecture & Behaviour, 10(2), 189-204. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Space-Syntax-Methodology%3A-Fits-and-Misfits-Osman-Suliman/59e96f9ad7956212f138b4906d77000abfe787d1
Ostwald, M.J. (1997). Structuring Virtual Urban Space: Arborescent Schemas. Amsterdam:Peter Droege, ed. 
Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Rashid, M., & Bafna, S. (1997). On the Description of Shape and Spatial Configuration Inside Buildings: Convex Partitions and their Local Properties. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(5), 761-781. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240761
Schoenauer, N. (2010). Cities, Suburbs, Dwellings. Tehran: Rozaneh. 
Tavassoli, M. (1984). Architecture in the Hot Arid zones. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. 
Turner, A.D., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: a Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 103-121. DOI: 10.1068/b2684
Zako, R. (2006). The Power of the Veil: Gender Inequality in the Domestic Setting of Traditional Courtyard Houses. in Courtyard Housing: Past, Present and Future, 65-75. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development
Volume 13, Issue 30
June 2020
Pages 43-55

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 23 January 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics