Althusser, L. (2006). Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987. (G.M. Goshgarian, Verso Trans. and ed.).
Castells, M. (1977). Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. (A. Sheridan Trans.). Cambridge. Ma: MIT Press.
Chalmers, A. (1994).What is This Thing Called Science: An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Methods. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co. (Indianapolis)
Collins, H. & Pinch, T. (1998). The Golem; What You Should Know About Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Faludi, A. (1973). Planning Theory. Pergamon Press.
Feldman, M. (1997).Can we Talk? Interpretive Planning Theory as Comedy. In: Planning Theory, Political Economy and the Interpretive Turn, ed., Patsy Healey, pp. 43-65.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method; Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: NLB.
Forester, J. (1996). Beyond Dialogue to Transformative Learning: How Deliberative Rituals Encourage Political Judgment in Community Planning Processes. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, No.46, 295-333.
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Friedmann, J. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. London & New York: Taylor &Francis Group.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery; an Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Healey, P. (1992). Planning through Debate: the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory. Town Planning Review, Vol. 63, No 2, 143.
Healey, P. (1997a). Situating Communicative Practices: Moving Beyond Urban Political Economy. In: Planning Theory, Political Economy and the Interpretive Turn, 6583.
Healey, P. (1997b).Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. University of British Columbia Press.
Hillier, J & Healey, P. (2008). Critical Essays in Planning Theory, Vol. 2. Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.
Hoch, C. J.(1997). Planning Theorists taking an Interpretive Turn Need not Travel on the Political Economy Highway. In:Planning Theory, Political Economy and the Interpretive Turn.(P. Healey, ed.), 1340 & 83.
Hoch, C. J. (2002). Evaluating Plans Pragmatically. Planning Theory. No. 1, 53.
Hoch, C. J. (2006). What Can Rorty Teach an Old Pragmatist Doing Public Administration or Planning?Administration & Society, No. 38, 389.
Hopkins, L. D. (2006). In What Circumstances Should Plans Be Public? Paper Presented At The 2nd World Planning Conference, Mexico City, July.
Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 14, 183-189.
Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning Through Consensus Building: a New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal.Journalof the American Planning Association, 62( 4), 72-460.
Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage; Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 6S, No.1. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Lauria, M. (1997). Communicating in a vacuum: Will Anyone Hear? In: Planning Theory, Political Economy and the Interpretive Turn, (Patsy Healey ed.), 40-43.
Lefebvre, H. (1970). Reflections on the Politics of Space. (Michael J. Enders, Antipode Trans.). Vol. 7, No. 2.
Peet, R. & Thrift, N. (1989). Political Economy and Human Geography. In: New Models in Geography, Vol. 2, (R. Peet and N. Thrift eds.). London: Unwin Hyman.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge; Towards A Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Pombo, O. et al. (2011). Otto Neurath and theUnity of Science. University of Texas.
Quine, W. V. & Kemeny, J. G. (1952). Review of Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 17, no. 4, 281-283.
Ragland, C. P. & Heidt, S. (1998). What is Philosophy? New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Robinson, G. (1998). Philosophy and Mystification; A Reflection on Nonsense and clarity. London &New York: Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-80. University of Minnesota Press.
Rorty, R. (1987). Science as Solidarity. In: The Rhetoric of the Human Science, ed. John S. Nelson et al., 38-52. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Rorty, R. (1999).Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin.
Rorty, R. (2010). Philosophy as science, as metaphor, and as politics. In: The Rorty Reader, ed. Christopher J. Voparil et al., 211-226. Willey Blackwell Press.
Sager, T. (1999). The Rationality Issue in Land-Use Planning. Journal of Management History, Vol. 5 Iss: 2, 87–107.
Sandercock, L. & Berry, M. (1983).Introduction. In: Urban Political Economy: The Australian Case, Sydney, eds. Sandercock, L. and Berry, M. George Allen and Unwin Australia Pty Ltd.
Stroll, A. (2002). Wittgenstein. Oneworld Oxford, England. Taylor, N. (1980). Planning Theory and the Philosophy of Planning. Urban Studies, No. 17, 159-172.
Torres, R. D. and Martin, E. J. (2004).Savage State: Welfare Capitalism and Inequality. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and Understanding; an Enquiry into the Aims of Science. Indiana University Press.