نقش محیط های ساخته شده در سلامت روان

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

با وجودی که افراد ساعات قابل توجهی از عمر خویش را درون محیط های ساخته شده به سر م یبرند، اما از تاثیر مستقیم عوامل محیطی و مناظر پیرامون مجموعه های ساخته شده بر سلامت روان، خصوصا فشار روانی (استرس)، آگاهی چندانی ندارند. در حیطه روان شناسی محیط، پژوهش های متعددی درباره استرس و تاثیر آن بر سلامت روان صورت گرفته، اما تاکید این مطالعات بیشتر بر مولفه های شخصی، شرایط اجتماعی و حتی متغیرهای محیطی مانند آلودگی صوتی، دمای محیط، ازدحام و تراکم بوده است. در این راستا مطالعات اندکی بر تاثیرات مستقیم طراحی محیط بر سلامت روان صورت گرفته است. لذا هدف از مطالعه حاضر این است که همگام با بررسی نظریه های موجود در حیطه روان شناسی محیط، آن دسته از ویژگی های خاص محیط طراحی شده که عوامل تولید استرس و افزایش یا کاهش آن محسوب می شوند، مورد بررسی قرارگیرند. روش تحقیق بر اساس مطالعات کتابخانه ای و تحلیل محتوایی پیرامون مبانی نظری پژوهش مورد نظر می باشد که با توجه به یافته های نوین در زمینه های روان شناسی محیط، روان شناسی عمومی و طراحی معماری صورت پذیرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the Effect of Built Environments on Psychological Health

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Tabatabaian 1
  • Mina Tamannaee 2
1 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Lecturer of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, South Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Psychological understanding of human behavior in relation to physical environment  Has been extensively studied with in the field of environmental psychology. In fact, the       focus of environmental psychology has been on how human’s behavior, emotions and sense of health are affected by physical environment. Environmental psychologists directly and indirectly and from different points of view have studied the impacts of physical environment on human behavior and his sense of health. While researchers have made progress in elucidating the effects of open spaces on mental health, there are few studies about the role of built environments in mental health. Some researchers believe that the sensory and emotional quality of environment are the main factors of determining the mood and also the memories associated with a situation are the most crucial part of the relationship between humans and their environment which can affect the individual’s health. According to literature review, the amount of information the environment can provide is described as the “environmental load”. So, an environment with a high load is the one that provides us with a lot of sensory information. Three factors are associated with the environmental load: intensity, novelty, and complexity. One of the well noted studies underlines the fact that four factors determine our reactions to the environment which are: coherence, legibility, complexity and mystery. In another research five groups of environmental design factors including stimulation. Coherence, affordance, control, and mental reconstruction are mentioned that any nonconformity in the balance of their variables would lead to reduction or multiplication of psychological pressure. Another study examines the direct and indirect impacts of built environmental factors on mental health and concludes that the features of built environment that directly affect mental health are crowding, sound pollution, air quality, and light. In addition to the direct impacts, alterations in the mental-social process with proven psychological consequences, can also indirectly affect human mental health. Considering the fact that the main assumption of this study, the indoor design can affect human physical and mental health by stress reduction or stress increase, much effort has been made to examine and recognize the most important and effective variables in this case. So, with regard to the span of the subject, first, stress will be defined and  then the related factors and the relevant theories will be discussed. The research method of this study is based on the content analysis of theoretical research and examination of the new findings in the context of environmental psychology   and architectural design. In this study the framework of Evans and McCoy has been used which mentions five effective factors of stress reduction or stress increase in  built environments as followings: Mental reconstruction and restoration, Stimulation, Coherence, Affordance, and Control. One of the best known theories in the field of mental reconstruction and restoration is the “attention restorative theory”. According to this theory, optional focused attention creates fatigue or mental exhaustion in human beings. However, mental exhaustion can be recovered when there are the following four features in the environments: being away from the concentration ring, expanding the extent of sight, fascination and attraction, and compatibility of environment with individual’s desires. Stimulation happens when the amount of information in an environment goes beyond a person’s capacity of acceptance and perception. Related research shows that extreme stimulation causes dysfunction; lack of stimulation and enough motivation could also deprive “a person’s functional organism” from being successfully adapted to environment challenges. The term of coherence refers to clarity and comprehensibility of forms, elements, parts and components of a building and the relationships among them. In this area, Gestalt psychologists have also paid attention to how sensory intakes are organized, or how a whole is formed and pulled together out of the parts. Researchers believe that Environment is a set of organized capabilities or “affordances”. Environment capabilities or affordances are its physical features that make it usable for a particular creature. In other words, affordances are those properties that make an environment function to supply human or animal needs. Studies show that when people have the ability to change their environment and adjust to it, they are able to manage the environment. The following concepts are closely  interconnected with the concept of control: spatial limits, flexibility of spatial arrangement and configuration, privacy, territory, proper perspective, depth, open space around the  building site, the vision, responsiveness, climate control and the light. The main conclusion of this article is that if the existing theories in environmental psychology and environment design are applied and considered by designers, they would enhance human physical and mental health. It is noteworthy that more precise results would likely be attained through further research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Built Environments
  • Environmental Psychology
  • mental health
  • Stress
-- Adolph, K. E. (1995). Psychophysical Assessment of Toddler’s Ability to Cope with Slopes. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 734-750.

-- Adolph, K. E., Gibson, E. J. & Eppler, M. A. (1990). Perceiving Affordances of Slopes: The Ups And Downs of

Toddlers Lcomotion. Emory Cognition Project, Report# 165, Atlanta, GA: Emory University.

-- Aiello, J. (1987). Human Spatial Behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology,

New York: Wiley, pp 385-504.

-- Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Brooks:

Cole Publishing Company.

-- Archea, J. (1977). The Place of Architectural Factors in Behavioral Theories of Privacy. Journal of Social Issues,

33(3), 116-137.

-- Arizi, H. & Farahany, H. (2008). Practical Procedures of Research in Clinical Psychology and Consulting. Tehran:

Danzheh Publishing Co

-- Baum, A., Paulus, P. B. (1987). Crowding. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology,

New York: Wiley, 534-570.

-- Bechtel, R. (1976). Enclosing Behavior. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

-- Bell, P. A. (1981). Physiological, Comfort, Performance, And Social Effects Of Heat Stress. Journal of Social

Issues, 37, 71-94.

-- Bell, P. A. & Green, T. C. (1982). Thermal Stress: Psychological, Comfort, Performance, and Social Effects Of

Hot and Cold Environmenys. In G.W. Evance (Eds), Environmental Stress, Cambridge University Press, 75-105.

-- Bell, P. A. (2005). Reanalysis and Perspective in the Heat-Agresion Debate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 89, 71-73.

-- Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychology. NewYork: Appleton, Century Crofts.

-- Birren, F. (1978). Color and Human Respons. NewYork: Van Nostrand Company.

-- Birren, F. (1961). Color psychology and Color therapy, Secaucus. New Jersy: University Books Inc.

-- Cohen, S., Evans, G. W., Stokols, D. & Krantz, D. S. (1986). Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress. NewYork:

Plenum.

-- Dondis, Donis A. (1983). A Primer of Visual Literacy. Massachusett Institute, Technology Cambridge. Massachusett:

Mit Press.

-- Evans, G. W. (2003). The Built Environment and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New

York Academy of Medicine, 80(4), 536-555.

-- Evans, G. W. & Cohen, S. (1987). Environmental Stress. In D. Stokols, I. Altman (Eds), Hanbook of Environmental

Psychology, New York: Wiley, 571-610.

-- Evans, G. W. & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When Buildings Don’t Work: The Role of Architecture in Human Health.

Journal of Environmental Physiology, 18, 85-94.

-- Evans, G. W., Rachel S. (2004). Motivational Consequences of Environmental Stress. Journal of Environmental

Psychology, 24(2), 143-165.

-- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Hughtonmiff Lin.

-- Gifford, R. (1997). Environmental Psychology. Principles and Practice. London, Boston: Allyn & bacan.

-- Glass, D. C. & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban Stress. New York: Academic Press.

-- Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New

York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

-- Ievy, B. I. (1984). Research in to The Psychological Meaning of Color. American Journal of Art Therapy, 23,

56-62.

-- Heft, H. (1981). An Examination of Constructivist and Gibsonian Approaches to Environmental Psychology, Population

and Environment: Behavioral and Social Issues, 4, 227-245.

-- Heft, H. (1988a). The Development of Gibson’s Ecological Approach to Perception: a Review Essay. Journal of

Environmental Psychology, 8, 825-334.

-- Kaminski, G. (1989). The Relevance of Ecologically Oriented Conceptualizations to the Theory Building in Environment

and Behavior Research. In E. It. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds). Advances in Environment, Behavior and

Design, 2, 3-36, New York: Plenum.

-- Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature. New York: Cambridge.

-- Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1982). Cognition and Environment. New York: Praeger.

-- Kripke, D. F., Rische, S. C. & Janowsky, D. (1983). Bright White Light Alleviates Depression. Psychiatry Research

10, 105-112.

-- Kuller, R. & Lindsten, C. (1992). Health and Behavior of Children in Classrooms with and Without Windows.

Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 305-317.

-- Landwehr, K. (1988). Environmental Perception: An Ecological perspective. In D. Canter, M. Krampen & D. Stea

(Eds), Ethnoscapes, vol. 1: Environmental perspectives, 18-38, Alder shot, England: Averbury.

-- Lynch, Kevin. (1960). the Image of the City. MIT Press.

-- Mark, D. S. (1987). Eye Height-Scaled Information about Affordances: A Study of Sitting and Stair Climbing.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Tluman Perception and Performance, 13, 683-703.

-- Mark, D. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., Fox, T. (1990). What an Actor Must Do in order to Perceive

the Affordance for Sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325-366.

-- Mehrabian, A., Russell, J. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

-- Mehrabian, A. (1987). The Three Dimensions of Emotional Reaction. Psychology Today, 10(3), 57-61.

-- Norman, D. (1989). The psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic.

-- Proshansky, H. M., Ittleson, H. W., Rivlin G. L. (1970). Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Setting.

New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

-- Pufall, P. & Dunbar, C. (1992). Perceiving Weather or Not the World Affords Stepping on to an Over: A Developmental

Study. Ecological Psychology, 4, 17-38.

-- Russell, J. A., Snodgras, J. (1987). Emotion and the Environment. In D. Stokolos & I.Altman (Eds), Handbook of

environmental Psychology. Toronto: John wiley & sons.

-- Selye, H. (1976). Stress in Health and Disease. Reading (Mass): Butterworths.

-- Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

-- Veitch, J. A., Gifford, R., Hine, D. W. (1991). Demand Characteristics and Full Spectrum Lighting Effects on Performance and Mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 87-95.

-- Walden, T. A., Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Close Encounters of the Stressful Kind: Affective, Physiological, and Behavioral

Reactions to the Experience of Crowding. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 46-64.

-- Walden, T. A., Nelson, P., Smith, D. E. (1981). Crowding, Privacy And Coping. Environment and Behavior, 13,

205-224.

-- Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving Affordances: Visual Guidance of Stair Climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Human Perception and Performance, 10(5).

-- Weismen, G. (1981). Evaluating Architectural legibility. Environment and Behavior, 13, 189-204.

-- Weismen, G. (1989). Designing Orient the User, in: Architecture. The AIA Journal, 78(10), 113-114.