Bourgeois, D., Reinhart, C., & Ward, G. (2008). Standard Daylight Coefficient Model Fordynamic Daylighting Simulations, Build. Res. Inf, 36(1), 68-82.
DOI: 10.1080/09613210701446325Cantin, F., & Dubois. M.C. (2011). Daylighting Metrics Based on Illuminance, Distribution,Glare and Directivity, Light. Res. Technol, 43(3), 291-307.
DOI: 10.1177/1477153510393319Carlucci, S., Causone, F., De Rosa, F., & Pagliano, L. (2015). A Review of Indices for Assessingvisual Comfort With a View to Their Use in Optimization Processes to Supportbuilding Integrated Design, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev, 47, 1016-1033.
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v47y2015icp1016-1033.htmlCostanzo, V., Evola, G., Marletta, L., & Panarelli, D. (2017). Static and Dynamic Strategies for Improving Daylight use in Side-Lit Classrooms: A Case Study, In Proceedings of the BSA 2017-3rd IBPSA Italy Conference, Bozen, Italy, 8-10.
Gherri, B. (2015). Assessment of Daylight Performance in Buildings (Methods and Design Strategies), University of Parma, Italy,WIT Press, 100-220.
Ibarra, D. (2013). Teaching Daylight Simulations Improving Modeling Workflows for Simulation Novices, Proceeding of BS2013, 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, (Chambery, France), 1126-1135.
Konis, K., Gamas, A., & Kensek, K. (2016). Passive Performance and Building Form: Anoptimization Framework for Early-Stage Design Support, Sol. Energy, 125, 161-179.
Mardaljevic, J., Heschong, L., & Lee, E. (2009). Daylight Metrics and Energy Savings, Light.Res. Technol, 41(3), 261-283.
https://wem.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl-4585e.pdfNabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2005). Useful Daylight Illuminance: A New Paradigm Forassessing Daylight in Buildings, Light. Res. Technol, 37(1), 41-57.
DOI: 10.1191/1365782805li128oaPiderit Moreno, M.B., & Labarca, C.Y. (2015). Methodology for Assessing Daylightingdesign Strategies in Classroom with a Climate-Based Method. Sustainability, 7(1), 880-897.
DOI: 10.3390/su7010880Reinhart, C., Mardaljevic, J., & Rogers, Z. (2006). Dynamic Daylight Performance Metricsfor Sustainable Building Design. Leukos, 3(1), 7-31.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.8133&rep=rep1&type=pdfReinhart, C., Rakha, T., & Weissman, D. (2014). Predicting the Daylit Area-a Comparison of Students Assessments and Simulations At Eleven Schools of Architecture. Leukos, 10(4), 193-206.
DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2014.929007Reinhart, C., & Walkenhorst, O. (2001). Validation of Dynamic Radiance-Based Daylight Simulations for a Test Office with External Blinds. Energy Build, 33(7), 683-697.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5Reinhart, C., & Weissman, D. (2012). The Daylit Area–Correlating Architecturalstudent Assessments with Current and Emerging Daylight Availability Metrics, Build. Environ, 50, 155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.024Ruck, N., Aschehoug, O., Aydinli, A., Christoffersen, J., Courret, G., Edmonds, I., Jakobiak, R., Kischkoweit-Lopin, M., Klinger, M., Lee, E., Michel, L., Scartezzini, J.L., & Selkowitz, S. (2000). Daylight in Buildings: A Source Book on Daylighting Systems and Components, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA, 103-1030.
Standard IES LM-83–1. (2012). Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure, (ASE), Illuminating Engeneering Society: New York, NY, USA.
U. ASHRAE, CIBSE. (2010). Performance Measurement Protocols for CommercialBuildings.
Zomorodian, Z.S., & Tahsildoost, M. (2017). Assessment of Window Performance in Classrooms by Long Term Spatial Comfort Metrics. Energy Build, 134, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.018
http://www.tehran.climatemps.com/graph.ph