جهانبخش، بهاره، و مرتضی پورمحمدی. 1397. بررسی تاثیر تکنولوژی در دسترس بر نحوهی تفکر طراحان محصول مبتدی و حرفهای با استفاده از روش لینکوگرافی. نشریه هنرهای زیبا- هنرهای تجسمی 23 (2):111-118.
لاوسون، برایان. 1395. طراحان چه میدانند. ترجمه حمید ندیمی، فرهاد شریعت راد و فرزانه باقی زاده. تهران: مرکز چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
Akin, Omer, and Cem Akin. 1996. “Frames of Reference in Architectural Design Analyzing the Hyper-Acclamation (A-h-a-!).” Design Studies 17, no. 4: 341-361. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.684.3069&rep=rep1&type=pdf Accessed Aug 9,2022.
Boden, margaret A. 2004. The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. London and New York: Routledge. http://www.tribuneschoolchd.com/uploads/tms/files/1595167242-the-creative-mind-pdfdrive-com-.pdf.
Cross, Nigel. 1997. “Creativity in Design:Analyzing and Modeling the Creative Leap.” Leonardo 30, no. 4: 311-317.
Cross, Nigel. 2001. “Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity.” In Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, edited by C Eastman, M McCracken, W Newstetter, 79-103. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. http://oro.open.ac.uk/3285/1/Design%20Cognition.pdf
Dorst, Kees. 2019. “Design beyond Design.” The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 5, no. 2: 117-127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872618300790
Dorst, Kees. 2006. “Design Problems and Design paradoxes.” Design Issues 22, no. 3: 4-17. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/4866/3/2006004859.pdf
Dorst, Kees, and Judith Dijkhuis. 1995. “Comparing paradigms for describing design activity.” Design Studies 16, no. 2: 261-274.
Dorst, Kees, and Nigel Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the design process:co-evolution of problem-solution.” Design Studies 22, no. 5: 425-437. http://oro.open.ac.uk/3278/1/creativity_-_coevolution.pdf
Eckersley, Michael. 1988. “The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study.” Design Studies 9, no. 2: 86-94. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Eckersley/publication/243778116_The_Form_of_Design_Processes_a_protocol_analysis_study/links/59b0b1d4a6fdcc3f8889b673/The-Form-of-Design-Processes-a-protocol-analysis-study.pdf
El-Khouly, TAI, and A Penn. 2013. “Directed Linkography and syntactic analysis: comparing synchronous and diachronic effects of sudden emergence of creative insights on the structure of the design process.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by Y-O Kim, HT Park, KW Seo. Seoul: Sejong University. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1414845/2/SSS9_paper_El-Khouly&Penn.pdf
Goel, Vinod. 1995. Sketches of Thought. California: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 1992. “Criteria for design evaluation: A process oriented Paradigm.” In Evaluating and predicting design performance, edited by Y E. Kalay, 67-79. NY: John & Wiley Sons. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriela-Goldschmidt/publication/30870328_Criteria_for_Design_Evaluation_A_Process-Oriented_Paradigm/links/542a804d0cf27e39fa8ea10f/Criteria-for-Design-Evaluation-A-Process-Oriented-Paradigm.pdf
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 2016. “Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design.” Creativity Research Journal 28, no. 2: 115-122. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriela-Goldschmidt/publication/302633127_Linkographic_Evidence_for_Concurrent_Divergent_and_Convergent_Thinking_in_Creative_Design/links/5738d23508ae9ace840cfc46/Linkographic-Evidence-for-Concurrent-Divergent-and-Convergent-Thinking-in-Creative-Design.pdf
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 2014. Linkography: Unfolding The Design Process. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 1995. “The designer as a team of one.” Design Studies 16, no. 2 (1995): 189-209.
Hatcher, G., W. Ion, R. Maclachlan, M. Marlow, B. Simpson, and N. Wilson. 2018. “Using linkography to compare creative methods for group ideation.” Design Studies 58: 127-152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X18300395
Herrmann, Marnina Eden, and Gabriela Goldschmidth. 2018. “The Ins And Outs Of The Constraint-Creativity Relationship.” Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2018). UK: University of Bath, https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/40712/THE+INS+AND+OUTS+OF+THE+CONSTRAINT-+CREATIVITY+RELATIONSHIP
Howard, T., S. Culley, and E. Dekoninck. 2007. “Creativity in the Engineering Design Process.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, July 28.-31, 2007, https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/25496/Creativity+in+the+Engineering+Design+Process
Maher, Mary Lou, and Hsien-Hui Tang. 2003. “Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design.” Research in Engineering Design 14, no. 1: 47-64. https://ir.nctu.edu.tw/bitstream/11536/28133/1/000181594500005.pdf
Schon, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner, How Peofessionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Simon, Herbert A. 1969. The sciences of the artificial. London: The MIT Press.
Suwa, Masaki, John Gero, and Terry Purcell. 1999. “Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: A key to creative designs.” In ments: A key to
creative designs, in J. S. Gero and M. L. Maher (eds), Computational Models of Creative Design IV, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, edited by J. S. Gero and M. L. Maher, 297-320. Australia: University of Sydney. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Gero/publication/2322812_Unexpected_Discoveries_And_S-Invention_Of_Design_Requirements_A_Key_To_Creative_Designs/links/56574f2108ae1ef9297bae55/Unexpected-Discoveries-And-S-Invention-Of-Design-Requirements-A-Key-To-Creative-Designs.pdf
Suwa, Masaki, John Gero, and Terry Purcell. 2000. “Unexpected Discoveries and S-Invention of Design Requirements: Important Vehicles for a Design Process.” Design Studies 21, no. 6: 539-567. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.1476&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Taura, Toshiharu, and Yukari Nagai. 2013. Concept Generation for Design Creativity. London: Springer-Verlag.
Tschimmel, Katja. 2010. “Design as a Perception-in-Action Process.” In Design Creativity 2010, edited by Toshiharu Taura and Yukari Nagai, 223-230. London: Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Katja-Tschimmel/publication/236135138_Design_as_a_Perception-in-Action_Process/links/0deec51646329cfcb7000000/Design-as-a-Perception-in-Action-Process.pdf
Tversky, Barbara, and Juliet Y. Chou. 2010. “Creativity:Depth and Breadth.” In Design Creativity 2010, edited by Toshiharu Taura and Yukari Nagai, 209-214. London: Springer-Verlag. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/30726486/978-0-85729-224-7_Book_PDF-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1660153327&Signature=HicWiO6C3ubbyqvllTUOUTgD3-LtwilZBw3K14kgg5OOlAlcUZz4gHrgq8TtYgdClwgUhOqq~JzicyTKvrdgnRZCPfjfsor3fqUZjAlDGs5lbcrQNkbhLS94ZeotmWUpPKCrNQOLTd46geYLDcms9NYlYQFZyzJmRa66tyINyYdUadyMbZl8roYg-j3yFgWC8C41Y3HeWepPTwCUR~c-GBNOEHjo67B0jir6B~NGUpNZQ3byQUON00Z8wVMTWRhSgtMsh1g6P22icI8xNU6LO79nJO04pJWN0CV0VsL2bZ09MZngx77GGMPblPjzR7DOqwr6HM5VhCc-U~F70tyqlg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA#page=221
Wallas, Graham. 1926. The Art of Thought. Kent: Solis Press.