بهینه‌سازی طراحی فضایی ایستگاه‌های مترو شهری با استفاده از روش نحو فضا

حق‌لسان, مسعود

doi:10.22034/aaud.2023.360784.2716

بهینه‌سازی طراحی فضایی ایستگاه‌های مترو شهری با استفاده از روش نحو فضا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

مسعود حق‌لسان

استادیار، گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد ایلخچی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلخچی، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).

10.22034/aaud.2023.360784.2716

چکیده

در دهه‌های اخیر به علت کمبود زمین شهری در کلان‌شهرها، استفاده از فضاهای شهری زیرزمینی به‌ عنوان یکی از فضاهای عمومی نوظهور شهری مورد توجه طراحان، سیاست‌گذاران و تصمیم‌گیران شهری قرار گرفت. مسأله اصلی در فضاهای شهری زیرزمینی، نحوه طراحی و بهینه‌سازی ایستگاه‌های مترو شهری به ‌عنوان محل تعاملات اجتماعی افراد می‌باشد که کم‌تر مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. همچنین عدم توجه به ساختار و کیفیت فضایی ایستگاه‌های مترو شهری باعث ظهور مشکلاتی در نحوه استفاده مناسب از فضاهای داخلی ایستگاه‌ها شده است. هدف از این مقاله استفاده از روش نحو فضا جهت شناسایی، ارزیابی و بهینه‌سازی ایستگاه‌ها بر اساس مؤلفه‌های مسیریابی، جهت‌گیری و دید در ایستگاه‌های مترو شهری تبریز می‌باشد. در پژوهش پیشِ رو، مؤلفه‌های مسیریابی، جهت‌گیری و دید در دو ایستگاه منتخب شهر تبریز؛ میدان ساعت و میدان کهن مورد بررسی و آزمون قرار گرفته‌اند. در این پژوهش روش توصیفی و تحلیلی استفاده شده است و تجزیه ‌و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش نحو فضا و بر پایه نقشه‌های گرافیکی و آماری استخراج‌ شده از تحلیل محوری¹، تحلیل جهت‌گیری²، تحلیل ایزوویستی³، تحلیل حرکت طبیعی⁴ انجام‌ شده است که این تحلیل‌ها در طراحی و بهینه‌سازی فضاها تأثیر به‌سزایی دارند. نتایج و یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که روش نحو فضا سهم ملموسی در طراحی کیفی ایستگاه‌های زیرزمینی شهری داشته است. ایستگاه میدان ساعت نسبت به ایستگاه میدان کهن، با مسیرهای واضح و مستقیم به لحاظ فضایی به خوبی سازماندهی شده و در تحلیل‌ها عملکرد نسبتاً خوبی از حیث نفوذپذیری کالبدی و بصری، انسجام و ساختار فضایی داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimizing the spatial design of urban metro stations using the space syntax method

نویسنده [English]

Masoud Haghlesan

Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ilkhchi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilkhchi, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In recent decades, due to the lack of urban land in big cities, the use of underground urban spaces as one of the emerging urban public spaces has attracted the attention of designers, policy makers and urban decision makers. The main issue in underground urban spaces is how to design and optimize urban metro stations as a place for people's social interactions, which has received less attention. Failure to pay attention to the structure and spatial quality of urban metro stations has caused problems in how to properly use the internal spaces of the stations. The purpose of this article is to use the space syntax method to identify, evaluate and optimize stations based on routing, orientation and visibility components in Tabriz metro stations. In the upcoming research, these components in two selected stations of Tabriz city; Clock Square and Old Square have been examined and tested. In this research, descriptive and analytical methods have been used and data analysis has been done using space syntax technique and based on graphic and statistical maps extracted from axial analysis 1, orientation analysis 2, isovist analysis 3, natural motion analysis 4, which have a significant impact on the design and optimization of spaces. . The results and findings of the research show that the spatial structure has made a tangible contribution to the quality design of urban underground stations. Saat Square station is well organized with clear and direct routes compared to Old Square station, and in the analysis it has performed relatively well in terms of physical and visual permeability, cohesion and spatial structure.

Keywords: Urban Underground Spaces, Metro Station Design, Space Syntax, Optimization of Metro Spaces

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Urban Underground Spaces
Metro Station Design
Space Syntax
Optimization of Metro Spaces

مراجع

Abbaszadegan, Mostafa, Razieh Rezazadeh, Maryam Mohammadi, and Sajjad Alipour Ashkili. 2010. Measuring the influencing factors on the level of satisfaction with living in the immediate neighborhoods of Tehran metro stations. Transport 7(3): 245-260. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/300850. [in Persian]
Aghajani, Shekoufeh, and Habib Shahhosseini. 2020. The relationship between the visual preferences of metro station passengers and the interior design of their space, case study: Tabriz metro stations. Armanshahr 13(33): 15-26. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_127654.html?lang=en. [in Persian]
Bafna, Sonit. 2003. Space Syntax A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytical Techniques. Environment and Behaviour 35(1): 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0013916502238863. Sage Publications.
Bagherzadeh Khosroshahi, Mahdieh. 2015. Bottom-up urban design (conceptual) formulation of the agenda of the participatory urban design process with the SHART approach (case example: the construction plan of the central metro station in Saat Square, Tabriz). Soffeh 25(1): 61-84. [in Persian]
Barani, Pesian, Mohammad Khosrozadeh, and Abbas Mollazadeh. 2012. The use of space arrangement in Waliasr Street in the city. Urban Management 10(29): 81-90. [in Persian]
Bélanger, Pierre. 2006. Underground landscape: the urbanism and infrastructure of Toronto’s downtown pedestrian network. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 22(3): 272-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.07.005
Benedikt, M. L. 1979. To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ b060047.
Bobylev, Nikolai. 2010. Underground space in the Alexanderplatz area, Berlin: research into the quantification of urban underground space use. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 25(5): 495-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.02.013
Broere, Wout. 2015. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. http://journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tust
Carmody, John, Olivier Huet, and Raymond Sterling. 1994. Life safety in large underground buildings: principles and examples. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 9(1): 19-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(94)90005-1.
Conroy Dalton, Ruth. 2001. “The secret is to follow your nose.” In Proceedings Space Syntax edited by Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Bafna, S. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1023/.
Danainia, Ahmad, and Morteza Majidi. 2019. Evaluation of metro station entrance design indicators in the historical context of Tehran based on passive defense considerations. Urban studies 9(33): 39-50. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_61316.html?lang=en. [in Persian]
Durmisevic, Sonja. 1999. The Future of the underground space. Elsevier Science Ltd 16(4): 245-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00022-0
Durmisevic, Sanja, and Sevil Sariyildiz. 2001. A systematic quality assessment of underground spaces – public transport stations. Cities 18(1): 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00050-0.
Edgü, Erincik. 2007. “Comparative Space Syntax Analysis of Design Strategies for Istanbul Underground Railway System.” Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.
Falahati, Leila. 2105. Spatial structure of the city and the sense of security among women (case study: Tajrish metro entrance and South Tehran terminal). Studies of the Iranian Islamic city 5(20): 61-73.
Hee Lee, Eun, George I. Christopoulos, Ming Lu, Min Quan Heo, and Chee-Kiong Soh. 2016). Social aspects of working in underground spaces. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 55: 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.012
Hernandez, Sara, Andres Monzon, and Rocío de Oña. 2015. Urban transport interchanges: A methodology for evaloating perceived quality. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.08.008
Heydari, Ali Akbar, and Nasrin Zaemi. 2017. Prioritization of influential indicators in the sociability of metro stations. Haft Hasar 6(19): 7-63. https://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-405-fa.html. [in Persian]
Heydari, Ali Akbar, Isa GhasemianAsl, and Maryam Kiaei. 2017. Analysis of the spatial structure of traditional Iranian houses using the space syntax method, a case study: comparing the houses of Yazd, Kashan and Isfahan. Studies of the Islamic Iranian city 7(28): 21-33. https://www.sid.ir/paper/505298/fa. [in Persian]
Hillier, Bill, and Julienne Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, Bill. 1988. Againt enclosure. In Rehumanising Housing, edited by Teymus, N., Markus, T., Woaley, T., 63-85. London: Butterworths.
Hillier, Bill. 1996. Space is the Machine. A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jiang, Bin, Christophe Claramunt, and Björn Klarqvist. 2000. Integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. JAG 2(3-4): 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85010-2
Khodabandelo, Hassan, Hadi Soltanifard, and Yaqoub Zanganeh. 2018. Feasibility of the walkability of the network of urban roads in the central part of Qom using Vicor model and space layout theory. Urban Planning Geography 6(2): 427-449. https://jurbangeo.ut.ac.ir/article_69179.html?lang=en . [in Persian]
Kim, Jaecheol. 2007. Testing the Street Connectivity of New Urbanism Projects and their Surroundings in Metro Atlanta Region. Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.
López, Manuel. 1996. Crime prevention within Metro Systems. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 4(4): 113-119. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02736717.
Mardomi, Karim, and Hesaam Ghamari. 2011. Influential Architectural Requirements in the Socialization of Subway Station Space. City Management 9(27): 31-40. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=150423. [in Persian]
Maria Kido, Ewa. 2010. Railway Landscape Design and Relationship with Form, Function and Aesthetic. Japan Railway & Transport Review 45: 22-30.
Mehrabian, Albert. 1976. Public Places and Private Spaces. New York: Basic Books.
Memarian, Qolamhossein. 2002. Architectural space syntax. Soffeh 12(35): 74-84. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_99829.html. [in Persian]
Morales, Jose, Johannes Flacke, Javier Morales, and Jaap Zevenbergen. 2019. Mapping Urban Accessibility in Data Scarce Contexts Using Space Syntax and Location-Based Methods. Appl, Spatial Analysis 12: 205-228. DOI: 10.1007/s12061-017-9239-1.
Mustafa, Faris Ali, and Ahmad Sanusi Hassan. 2013. Mosque Layout Design: an Analytical Study of Mosque Layouts in the Early Ottoman Period. Frontiers of Architectural Research 2(4): 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2013.08.005
Oftadeh, Javad. 2016. Analysis of social networks (together with the training of Nodaixal and Gefi network analysis software). Tehran: Sanieh. [in Persian]
Peek, Gert Joost, and Louw Erik. 2006. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach of Railway Station Development. The Architecture Annual: Delft University Of Technology, Amsterdam.
Rafiyan, Mojtaba, and Hadith Asgari Tafreshi. 2009. Investigating the “land supply pattern” in the areas around the metro station using the audience-oriented perspective, a case study of the Sadeghieh station. Urban Management 7(24): 81-93. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/61374. [in Persian]
Ranger, Kulveer. 2009. Interchange Best Practice Guidelines. London: Transport for London.
Rezaei Farei, Amirhasan, and Aliakbar Ehterami. 2019. Classification of the risk of surface structures and investigation of the performance of in-situ piles in reducing settlements caused by digging subway tunnels in urban areas (case study: Tabriz subway). Transport 5(1): 97-119. doi: 10.22075/JTIE.2018.13548.1278. [in Persian]
Salmani, Saeed, Khalil Vlizadeh Kamran, and Bakhtiar Feizizadeh. 2018. Developing Urban Smart Network Based on OMS Data for Crisis Management in GIS Environment in the Abrasan Subway Station. Transport 10(2): 233-243. [in Persian]
Samanifar, Sousan, Mohammad Khazaei, and Abbas Verij Kazemi. 2019. Investigating the views of Tehran subway passengers regarding the state of its environmental graphics (Case study: Tehran Metro signs and symbols system). Visual and applied arts 12(23): 5-24. https://www.sid.ir/paper/375563/en. [in Persian]
Sampaio, Breno Ramos, Oswaldo Lima Neto, and Yony Sampaio. 2008. Efficiency Analysis of public transport systems: Lessons for instutional Planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42(3): 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.006
Saygaonkar, Prathamesh , Mansha Swami, and M. Parida Prof. 2016. Station area design approach for enhancing multimodal urban transport system, New Delhi. Transportation Research Procedia 17: 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.057
Transportation Research Board. 1999. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Kerjcie and Morgan Determining Sample Size for research activities. Educational and psychological Measurement 30: 607-610.
Turner, Alasdair. 2007. “UCL Depthmap 7: From isovist analysis to generic spatial network analysis.” In New Developments in Space Syntax Software edited by Turner, A. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul. http://www.vr.ucl.ac.uk/events/syntaxsoftware07/turner.pdf.
Tyrinopoulos, Yannis, and Constantinos Antoniou. 2008. Public transit user satisfaction: Vriability and policy implications. Transport Policy 15(4): 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002
Van Nes, Akkelies, and Claudia Yamu. 2007. “Micro scale spatial relationships in urban studies. The relationship between private and public space and its impact on street life.” In Proceedings Space Syntax. 6th International Symposium, Istanbul. http://www.spacesyntaxistanbul.itu.edu.tr/papers%5Clongpapers% 5C023%20-%20VanNes%20Lopez.pdf.
Van Nes, Akkelies. 2012. “The one- and two-dimensional isovist analyses in space syntax.” In Exploring the Visual Landscape; Advances in Physiognomic Landscape Research in the Netherlands edited by Nijhuis, S., van Lammeren, R., van der Hoeven, F., 163-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.4233/uuid:fe6698ae045c-436b-945b-c61c4b0437e4.
Xu, YJ., X. Bai, and KF Chu. 2016. “Underground space in metro area: constituent, influencing factors and improving strategies of the spatial vitality.” 17th World Conference ACUUS 2020 Helsinki. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 703 (2021) 012016. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/703/1/012016.
Young, K., J. Chung, E. Kong, H. Shin, and J. Heo. 2015. A study on the design methodologies for activating. Jiang, Claramunt, Klarqvist.
Zheng, Wensheng, Nanqiao Du, and Xiaofang Wang. 2021. Understanding the City transport System of Urban Agglomeration through Improved Space Syntax Analysis. International Regional Science Review 45(2): 161-187. DOI: 10.1177/01600176211023879.