تحلیل نقش متغیرهای کالبدی موثر بر ارتقاء همبستگی اجتماعی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی، مورد مطالعاتی: مجتمع مسکونی سبحان و گلها در شهر تهران

قنبری مطلق, مهران; عظمتی, حمیدرضا; مرادی‌نسب, حسین; ملاصالحی, ودیهه

doi:10.22034/aaud.2025.478446.2915

تحلیل نقش متغیرهای کالبدی موثر بر ارتقاء همبستگی اجتماعی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی، مورد مطالعاتی: مجتمع مسکونی سبحان و گلها در شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

مهران قنبری مطلق ¹

حمیدرضا عظمتی ²

حسین مرادی‌نسب ³

ودیهه ملاصالحی ³

¹ دانشجوی دکتری معماری، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد سمنان، سمنان، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).

² استاد گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران.

³ استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.

10.22034/aaud.2025.478446.2915

چکیده

فعال‌سازی نقش افراد در فضا زمانی امکان‌پذیر است که رویدادها و برنامه‌های متناسب با بستر محیطی پیش‌بینی و سازماندهی شوند. انسان موجودی اجتماعی است و همواره بقای او وابسته به تعامل، همبستگی و ارتباط با دیگر انسان‌ها بوده است. در پژوهش حاضر، تلاش شده است تا قابلیت‌های فضایی و مؤلفه‌های کالبدی محیط و همچنین اصول طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی که می‌توانند در ارتقاء حس همبستگی و تعاملات اجتماعی ساکنان مؤثر باشند، شناسایی شود. در نهایت، مدلی برازنده و کارآمد برای طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی مبتنی بر تقویت همبستگی اجتماعی ارائه گردیده است. روش پژوهش به شیوه دلفی انجام شد و داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسش‌نامه‌ای دارای پایایی و روایی مناسب جمع‌آوری گردیدند. تحلیل داده‌ها با بهره‌گیری از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی و نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و AMOS انجام شد. نتایج مدل ساختاری نشان می‌دهد که ضریب مسیر بین دو متغیر «همبستگی اجتماعی» و «کیفیت محیط کالبدی» برابر با 0.87 است که حاکی از رابطه‌ای مثبت و در حد متوسط می‌باشد. همچنین، تحلیل روابط میان چهار متغیر پنهان پژوه -یعنی همبستگی اجتماعی، اجتماع‌پذیری، کیفیت محیط کالبدی و تعاملات اجتماع- قوی‌ترین ارتباط در مدل ساختاری را مشخص کرده است. بر این اساس، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که با بهبود کیفیت محیط کالبدی در طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی، انگیزه برای حضور و انجام فعالیت‌های فردی و اجتماعی ساکنان افزایش می‌یابد. مدل نهایی پژوهش که با ضرایب استاندارد در نرم‌افزار AMOS استخراج شده است، نشان می‌دهد که محیط کالبدی با ضریب مسیر 0.81 تأثیر مستقیم و معناداری بر شکل‌گیری و ارتقاء همبستگی اجتماعی دارد. همچنین کیفیت محیط کالبدی مجتمع‌های مسکونی با ضریب مسیر 0.96 بیش‌ترین اثر مثبت را در افزایش میزان همبستگی اجتماعی ساکنان ایفا می‌کند. به طور کلی، نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که ارتقاء مؤلفه‌های کالبدی و کیفیت فضاهای مسکونی می‌تواند به شکل معناداری بستر تقویت تعاملات اجتماعی، اجتماع‌پذیری و حس تعلق به مکان را فراهم آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مجتمع‌های مسکونی

همبستگی اجتماعی

تعاملات اجتماعی

متغیرهای کالبدی

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the Physical Components of the living Environment Effective in Promoting Social Solidarity in Residential Complexes; Case study: Sobhan and Golha Residential Complex in Tehran

نویسندگان English

Mehran Ghanbari Motlagh ¹

Hamidreza Azemati ²

Hossein Moradinasab ³

Vadie Molasalehi ³

¹ Ph.D. Candidate in architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Islamic Azad University, Semnan Branch (Corresponding Author).

² Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.

چکیده English

The role of individuals in space becomes significant when various events are anticipated and organized according to the environmental context. Humans are inherently social beings, and their survival has always relied on interaction, solidarity, and communication with one another. The present study aims to identify the spatial capabilities and physical components of the environment to develop design principles for residential complexes that effectively promote residents’ sense of social solidarity and encourage social interactions. Ultimately, the goal is to present a sufficient model for designing residential complexes that enhances social solidarity. To achieve this, data were collected through a questionnaire that demonstrated appropriate reliability and validity, alongside the Delphi technique. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS and AMOS software. The results of the structural model revealed a path coefficient of 0.87 between the two variables "social solidarity" and "quality of the physical environment", indicating a positive moderate relationship. Additionally, the analysis identified strong connections among the four latent variables: social solidarity, sociability, quality of the physical environment, and social interactions. Consequently, one can conclude that improving the quality of the physical environment in residential complexes fosters residents’ inclination to engage in that setting and participate in both individual and social activities. The final research model, derived from standard coefficients in AMOS software, demonstrated a significant direct effect of the physical environment (with a path coefficient of 0.81) on the formation and enhancement of social solidarity. Furthermore, the quality of the physical environment in residential complexes has the most substantial impact on strengthening residents’ social solidarity, as indicated by a path coefficient of 0.96. In general, the results suggest that improving the physical components and overall quality of residential spaces can significantly foster social interactions, sociability, and a sense of belonging among residents.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Residential Complexes

Social Solidarity

Social Interactions

Physical Variables

Abdulla, Aldrin, Mohd Najib Mohd Salleh, and Siti Rasidah Md Sakip. 2012. Fear of crime in gated and non-gated residential area. Social and Behavioral Sciences 35: 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.063
Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silversteing. 1977. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press.
Amini, Saba, Seyed Baqer Hosseini, and Saeed Norouzian Maleki. 2013. “Comparative Study of Residents’ Satisfaction in Two Mid- and High-Rise Residential Complexes: Case Studies of Shahid Mahalati and Sobhan Residential Complexes.” Arman-Shahr Architecture and Urbanism 6(11): 1-13. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_33461.html?lang=fa. [in Persian]
Arbabzadegan Hashemi, Seyed Alireza, and Ehsan Ranjbar. 2009. “Revisiting the Concept of Contrast in Enhancing Visual Diversity of Public Urban Spaces: Case Study of Baharestan Square. Tehran.” Arman-Shahr Architecture and Urbanism (3): 49-56. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32591.html. [in Persian]
Bazrafkan, Kāveh, and Maryam Gachkou. 2011. “The Role of Public Spaces in Shaping Social Interactions for Creating Social Sustainability in Cities.” National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urbanism, and Energy Management. https://civilica.com/doc/145163. [in Persian]
Behzadfar, Mostafa, and Arsalān Tahmasbi. 2013. “Identification and Evaluation of Factors Influencing Social Interactions and Strengthening Civic Relations in Urban Streets: Case Study of Sanandaj.” Scientific-Research Journal of Art, Architecture, and Urbanism, Nazar 10(25). [in Persian]
Bonaiuto, M., F. Fornara, and M. Bonnes. 2006. Perceived Residential Environment Quality In middle- And low-Extension Italian Cities, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, European Review of Applied Psychology 56(1): 23-34.
Canter, David V. 1977. The Psychology of lace. London: Architectural Press.
Einifar, A., and A. Agha Latifi. 2011, Territory concept in residential complexes, comparative study of two residential complexes on surface and in height in Tehran. Honarha-Ye-Ziba 47: 17.
Festinger, L. A., S. Schachter, K. Back. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper & Row.
Ghaedi, Abdolkarim. 2014. “Capability of Public Spaces in Residential Complexes.” Soffeh 24(67): 23-32. [in Persian]
Groter, Jörg. 2004. Aesthetics in Architecture. Translated by Jahanshah Pakzad and Abdolreza Homayoun. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [in Persian]
Jacobs, J. 1961. The dead and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Kim, Joongsub, and Rachel Kaplan. 2004. Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: new Urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard village. Environment and behavior 36(3): 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236
Kyungkim, S. 2006. The gate community: residents crime experience and perception of safety behind gates and fences in the urban area. Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A & M University.
Lang, John. 2002. Creating Architectural Theory. Translated by Alireza Eini-Far. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Lashgari, Farnaz, and Jamaleddin Soheili. 2022. “The Role of Social Interactions in Creating Environmental Security in Residential Complexes: Case Study of Phase One of Ekbatan Town, Tehran.” Amayesh-e Mohit Journal 15(59): 69-92. https://journals.iau.ir/article_700067.html. [in Persian]
Minnery, J. R., and B. Lim. 2005. Measuring crime prevention through environmental design. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 22(4): 330.
Mirzaali, Mohammad, and Hamidreza Razmi. 2016. “Exploring the Concept of Dwelling in Iranian-Islamic Culture and Architecture.” Third International Conference on Research in Science and Technology, Berlin. [in Persian]
Nasari, Bente Alhadi, Abdolhamid Ghanbaran, and Arash Nadami. 2016. “The Effect of Security on Sociability of Open Spaces in Residential Complexes in District 2 of Ilam.” Environmental Studies Haft-Hesar 5(18): 101-116. https://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-272-fa.html. [in Persian]
Nemāni, Mitra. 2015. Physical Design of Residential Complexes to Improve Quality of Social Interactions. Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch. [in Persian]
Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 2003. Meaning and Place in Architecture. Translated by Vida Norouz Barazjani. 4th ed. Tehran: Jan-Jahan. [in Persian]
Oliver, P., and A. Bridge. 2007. Atlas of vernacular architecture of the world. Routledge.
Partovi, Parvin. 2015. Phenomenology of Place. 3rd ed. Tehran: Academy of Arts. [in Persian]
Ragheb Esfahani, Hossein ibn Mohammad. 1995. Translation and Research of Quranic Vocabulary: Linguistic and Literary Interpretation. Translated by Gholamreza Khosravi Hosseini. Tehran: Mortezavi. [in Persian]
Rapoport, Amos. 2013. The Meaning of the Built Environment. Translated by Farah Habib. Tehran: Urban Planning & Processing Company. [in Persian]
Rasoulzadeh, Farzan, Azadeh Shahcheraghi, and Alireza Bandarabad. 2019. “Proposing a Model of Social Capital and Architecture in Residential Complexes Based on Social Construction.” Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism 7(1): 197-216. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2019.5758.1557. [in Persian]
Rong, Z. 2010. Improvement and recitalization of public spaces in the historical centre of macao towards the creation of a new sustainable urban environment: Jiangnan University, China.
Salehi, Esmaeil. 2008. Environmental Characteristics of Safe Urban Spaces. 1st ed. Tehran: Urban Studies and Architecture Research Center. [in Persian]
Sharehpour, Mahmoud. 2016. “Right to the City and Urban Public Spaces.” Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute 2(1): 51-66. http://pc.richt.ir/article-4-258-fa.html. [in Persian]
Taheri, Jafar. 2013. “Rethinking the Concept of Dwelling in Architecture.” Iranian Architectural Studies (4): 5-22. [in Persian]
Uni , K. R. 1965. Social factors in housing, The rural habitat. Editors: David Oakly, K.Ramman. New Delhi: UNNI, The School of planning & Architecture.
Yazdani, Samira, and Siavash Teimouri. 2013. “Effect of Open Spaces in Residential Complexes on Increasing Social Interactions of Residents: Case Study of Three Residential Complexes in Isfahan.” City Identity 7(15): 83-93. http://noo.rs/3kZSh. [in Persian]
Zucker, Paul. 1970. Town and square from the agora to the village green. England: The MIT Press.