Influencing Variables on Urban Spatial Structure in Metropolitan Regions; a Study in the Contemporary Theoretical Approaches and Practices

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی


1 Ph.D Candidate in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Geography, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Retired Professor of Geography, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

عنوان مقاله [English]

Influencing Variables on Urban Spatial Structure in Metropolitan Regions; a Study in the Contemporary Theoretical Approaches and Practices

نویسندگان [English]

  • Musa Pazhuhan 1
  • Ahmad Pourahmad 2
  • Ahmad Saeednia 3
  • Karamatoola Ziari 2
  • Mehdi Gharakhlou 3
1 Ph.D Candidate in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Geography, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Retired Professor of Geography, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Metropolitan regions as a result of the steady stream of urbanization in industrial period which have occurred during 20th century, become the engine of countries growth and development. In the process of formation and development in these areas, spatial structuring that define through two elements of population and activity with the communication structure interacting between them, has been effective on the overall performance and the characteristics of spatial structure in metropolitan regions. The main goal of this research is to study the most important factors influencing the trends in the spatial structure of metropolitan regions. Through studying the various theories and also the contemplation of metropolitan region samples in developed and developing countries, it is hoped that a better and deeper understanding of total trends of spatial changing will be reached. Besides the main reasons influencing these trends can be identified. The research method is comparative-analytical, and the study is done by the help of recent literature analysis and review on the spatial structure of metropolitan regions. Results show that in a general, metropolitan regions in developing countries have similar trends in their structure, but with time delay more than developed western examples. Moreover the four major factors: communication infrastructure, economic globalization, decentralization and more effective communication between agencies and companies have had the most influence on the spatial processes and changes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Metropolitan Regions
  • spatial structure
  • Metropolitan Growth Patterns
  • Spatial Changes

    • Aguiléra, A, Wenglenskiand S, & Proulhac, L. (2009). Employment Suburbanisation, Reverse Commuting and Travel Behavior by Residents of the Central City in the Paris Metropolitan Area, Transportation Research Part A, N, 685–691.
    • Alpkokin, P., Cheung, C., Black, J. & Hayashi, Y. ( 2008). Dynamics of Clustered Employment Growth and its Impact on Commuting Patterns in Rapidly Developing cities, Transportation Research Part A, Vol 42.
    • American Planning Association. (2006). Places and Place Making, Recent Theories: dispersed city, edge city, peripheral city, Mostafa behzadfar translation, urban development engineers association publications.
    • Anas, A., Arnott, R. & Small, K. (1998). Urban Spatial Structure, Journal of economic literature, pp 1426-1464.
    • Àngel, M. & López, G. (2010). Population Suburbanization in Barcelona, 1991–2005: Is its spatial structure changing? Journal of Housing Economics, 19, 119–132.
    • Baum-Snow, N. (2007). Suburbanization and Transportation in Themonocentric Model. Journal of Urban Economics, 62, 405–423.
    • Baum-Snow, N. (2008). Reply to Cox, Gordon, and Redfearn’s comment on ‘‘Did highways cause suburbanization?”. Econ Journal Watch, 5, 46–50.
    • Bertaud, A. (2002). The Spatial Organization of Cities: Deliberate Outcome or Unforeseen Consequence? World Development Report 2003, Dynamic Development in a Sustainable World. Background paper.
    • Camagni, R. & Salone, C. (1993). Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: elements for a theoretical framework. Urban Studies, 30, 1053–1064.
    • Castells, M. (1993). Why the Mega Cities Focus? Megacities in the New World Disorder, Mega-Cities 7th Annual Coordinators Meeting in Jakarta, Indonesia.
    • Champion T, (2001). Urbanisation, Suburbanisation, Counterurbanisation, and Reurbanisation, in Paddison, R. ed. Handbook of Urban Studies (Sage, London)
    • Champion, A.G. (2001). A Changing Demographic Regime and Evolving Polycentric Urban Regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations, Urban Studies, 38 (4), 657-677.
    • Clark, W.A.V & Kuijpers-Linde, M. (1994). Commuting in restructuring urban regions, Urban Studies, 31 (3), 465-483.
    • Cox, W., Gordon, P. & Redfearn, C.L. ( 2008). Highway Penetration of Centralcities: not a major cause of suburbanization. Econ Journal Watch, 5, 32–45.
    • Daniels, P.W. (1985). Service Industries: A geographical appraisal, (Methuen, London).
    • Evans, A. (1976). Economic Influences on Social Mix. Urban Studies,13, 247–260.
    • Friedmann, J. (1995). Where we stand: a decade of world city research, in Taylor, P.J.
    • Knox, P. & Pinch. L. (2001). World Cities in a World- System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21-47.
    • Fujita, M. & Ogawa, H. (1982). Multiple equilibria and structural transition ofnonmonocentric urban configurations, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, 161-196.
    • Guiliano, G., Agarwal, A. & Redfearn, C. (2008). Metropolitan Spatial Trends in Employment and Housing Literature Review, Special Report 298: Driving and The Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and Co2 Emissions.
    • Hajipoor, Kh. (2008). Explanation of Tehran metropolitan area formation, Ph.D theses, Tehran university.
    • Hall, P. & Pain, K. (2006). The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-City-Regions in Europe, London: Earthscan.
    • Hartshorn, T. A. & Muller P.O. (1986). Suburban Business Centers: Employment Implications, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Washington D.C cited in Stanback,1991 and Champion, 2001.
    • Muñiz, I., Galindo, A. & Miguel A, G. (2002). Urban Spatial Structure and Suburbanisation, Universit at Autònoma de Barcelona.
    • Khan, M.E. (2000). The Environmental Impact of Suburbanization. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 569–586.
    • Kloosterman, R.C., & Musterd, S. (2001). The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda, Urban Studies, 38 (4), 623-633.
    • Lang, R.E., & LeFurgy, J. (2003). Edgeless Cities: Examining the Noncentered Metropolis, Housing Policy Debate, 14 (3), 427-460.
    • Lee, B., Gordon, P. (2009). forthcoming. Urban spatial
    • structure and economic growth in US metropolitan areas, Journal of Regional Science.
    • Lüthi, S., Goebel V. & Thierstein, A. ( 2007). Spatial Development on the Quiet in the Mega-City-Region of Munich, ERSA-Conference Paper, Munich.
    • McMillen, D.P. (2003). Identifying Sub-centres Using Contiguity Matrices. Urban Studies, 40, 57–69.
    • Mieszkowski, P., & Smith., B. (1991). Analyzing Urban Decentralization: The case of Houston, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21 (2), 183-199.
    • Mieszkowski, Peter & Mills,. E. (1993). The Causes of Metropolitan.
    • Montgomery, M.R. (2003). Cities Transformed: Demographic Change and ItsImplications in the Developing World, National Academies Press.
    • Nijkamp, P., Finco, A. (2001). Sustainable Cities and Spatial Footprints. Paper Presented at the XXVII Reunión de Estudios Regional. Madrid, November 28–30.
    • Pain, K. (2012). Spatial Transformations of Cities: Global City-Region? Mega-City Region? International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 83-93.
    • Papageorgiou, Y.Y., & D. Pines. (1999). An Essay on Urban Economic Theory, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Aranya,. R. (2008). Location Theory in Reverse: An Evolutionary Model of Location for Global Production in the IT Industry of Bangalore, Journal of Environment and Planning A, 40 (2), 446-463.
    • Regional Plan Association, (2006). America 2050: A Prospectus, New York: Regional Plan Association.
    • Rickwood, P. & Glazebrook, G. (2009). Urban Structure and Commuting in Australian Cities, Journal of Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 00, No.18.
    • Sassen, S. (2000). Cities in a World Economy, Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
    • Schiller, R. (2001). The Dynamics of Property Location: Value and the factors which drive the location of shops, offices and other land uses (Spon Press, London)
    • Scott, A. J. (2001b). Globalization and the Rise of City- Regions, European Planning Studies, 9 (7), 813-826.
    • Sohn, J. (2005). Are Commuting Patterns a Good Indicator of Urban Spatial Structure? Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 306–317.
    • Sohn, H., Kim, T., Lee, J. & Kim, H. (2010). Spatial Analysis of Urban Structure Changes in Korean Mega- Cities, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 201-206.
    • Sun, T. (2009). Population and Employment Distribution and Urban Spatialstructure: an Empirical Analysis of Metropolitan Beijing, China in The Post-Reform Era, A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of The Graduate Schooluniversity of Southern California in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor Of Philosophy (Planning).
    • Taylor, P. J. & Pain, K. (2007). Polycentric Mega-city regions: Exploratory Research from Western Europe, The Healdsburg Research Seminar on Megaregions, Todorovich, P. (ed.), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Regional Plan Association.
    • Zebardast, E. & hajipoor, Kh. (2008). Explanation of Metropolitan Areas Formation and Change, human geographic research, 69, 105-121.
    • Zebardast, E. (2005) Metropolitan Areas Management, Center for Urban Development and Architecture Research, Ministry of Road and Urban Development.
    • Zenou, Y. (2012). Urban Labor Economics. Chap. 3: Non-Monocentric Cities and Search-Matching, 121-166.
    • Mohamadi, A., Sarafi, M. & Tavakolinia, J. (2012). Corporative Geography Advanced Producer Services in the Case of Tehran Metropolitan.