گونه شناسی انواع و مشخصات فنی رف های نوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

نور روز تأثیر قابل توجهی در کارآیی و کیفیت بهره گیری از محیط دارد. در این میان رف های نوری از جایگاه ویژه ای برخوردارند. رف های نوری یکی از فناوری های نور روز ترکیب شده با پنجره با عملکرد سه گانه سایه اندازی، افزایش عمق نفوذ نور به بخش های مرکزی و عمیق تر اتاق و کاهش خیرگی، و داشتن این مزیت که مانع دید به بیرون نمی شود، یکی از پرطرفدارترین فناوری ها محسوب می شود. این رف ها با توجه به اقلیم، فضا، کاربری و غیره انواع مختلفی دارند. ابعاد و تناسبات مختلف، جنس، فرم، زاویه نسبت به افق، ثابت یا متحرک بودن، داخلی، خارجی و یا ترکیبی از هر دو بودن، منفرد یا تکرارشونده بودن، تأثیر فضاهای داخلی، ترکیب با عناصر مکمل و مسائل دیگر، گزینه های متعددی را پیش روی ما قرار می دهد که انتخاب نوع مناسب را پیچیده می کند. در این پژوهش که از جنس مطالعات مروری می باشد، با بررسی مطالعات پیشین بر روی رف های نوری، به طبقه بندی الگوهای مختلف رف های نوری و متغیرهای آن برای فضاهای مختلف پرداخته می شود و بر اساس آن، کاربردهایی در حوزه به کارگیری در فرآیند طراحی معماری پیشنهاد می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Light Shelves’ Typology and their Characteristics

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fahimeh Motazedian 1
  • Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad 2
1
2
چکیده [English]

Daylight is an essential resource that is readily available and unlikely to run out through an unforeseeable future. Lighting affects the appearance of a place, its occupants’ mood and productivity level. Daylighting is chosen to save energy, avoid adverse health effects of over-illumination by artificial lights, and also for aesthetics matters. By careful usage of natural light and the appropriate control of electric light, saving important energies can be achieved. Daylight presence in buildings is vital for people, therefore daylighting should respond to their visual and perceptual needs. Visual  comfort  is  multidimensional; it  is  not  sufficient  to  simply  provide  adequate illumination  levels. Visual perception is the most developed sense of ours so for its comfort, glare must be controlled and patterns of contrast should be appropriate. Many innovative daylight devices have been invented that have different functions, such as light guiding, light transport and light diffracting systems. Light shelf is a direct light guiding system that is attached to a window. Light guiding systems refract and reflect sunlight to deeper parts of a place. Light shelf is considered as one of the most efficient solutions for the light energy issues. It is a part installed horizontally or with a slope way up a window to control and redistribute incoming sunlight and daylight. Light shelf improves the uniformity of daylight in a room by reflecting light into the building from its upper surface, while it provides solar shading and decreases glare. According to these features and also appropriate price and the quality that does not hinder the vision, it has been made with an eligible technology. Using light shelves decrease energy consumption. There are many kinds of light shelves based on their features, such as dimension, proportion, slope, material, geometry and form (rectangular, curved, etc.), their combination with other devices (such as solar shadings), being installed interior, exterior or both, being single or multiple, static or dynamic and effect of interior spaces (such as ceiling height or slope) and other matters, these variety of typologies makes it hard to choose the best alternative for any particular situation. Researches about light shelves began in the early 1950s. After a while many experts tended to know much about such systems and various studies have been conducted. This paper reviews the publications that discussed light shelves during recent years -about 43 papers and books- then classifies the light shelves and finds out about the exploration of each field. Three categories of research method, research questions and building functions have been surveyed in these researches. 1. Research method has been categorized to make model and test it under actual sky or artificial sky, computer simulation (such as Radiance, Daysim, Diva, etc.), post occupancy evaluation (POE) and evaluation of light shelf productivity in actual situations, and mathematical calculations. 2. Research questions have been categorized into introduction of a new method, comparison light shelf with other devices, light shelf efficiency, light shelf material, types of light shelves, and space proportion effects on light shelf function, new or combinative light shelves. 3. Building functions have been categorized into residential, office, commercial, educational and unknown. The review reveals that 35% of researches are based on computer simulation and this method has been developed and used more in recent years. Data calibration with two or three methods assures the researcher of the results. Making a model stands at the second position and simulation and making a model together is the third one. About 30% of researches were conducted on office buildings and that shows the importance of daylighting in such kind of properties. Educational spaces were the next one. Unfortunately many researches were operated on hypothetical spaces without any specific usage. It was clear that a large amount of researches were based on comparing of light shelves with other appliances and the results show that light shelves have a popularity and good qualification among other daylight technologies. After that surveying different features of light shelves have been tested. To control glare, light shelves can be used in combination with other devices, and to find the optimum case, all variables should be considered. Dynamic light shelves and new combinational devices are at the beginning of their way and it seems fulfilling as the advancement of science introduces and develops new systems. Finally, the use of light shelves is according to illuminate a space which should be integrated with the electric lighting system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Light Shelf
  • Daylight
  • Advanced Daylight Devices
  • Light Shelves’ Typology
Abdulmohsen, A., Boyer, L.L., & Degelman, L.O. (1994). Evaluation of Lightshelf Daylighting Systems for Of-
Arlington, TX.
-
ing Energy and Daylight Performance in Hot Arid Regions. Master of Science in architecture. Thesis, the University
of Arizona.
Aghemo, C., Pellegrino, A., & LoVerso, V.R.M. (2008). The Approach to Daylighting by Scale Models and Sun
and Sky Simulators: A Case Study for Different Shading Systems. Building and environment, 43(6), 917-927
-
mance of Classrooms. the 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland.
Athienintis, K.A., & Tzempelikos, A. (2002). A Methodology For Simulation Of Daylight Room Illuminance
Distribution And Light Dimming For a Room With A Controlled Shading Device. Solar Energy, 72(4), 271-281.
Baker, N., Fanchiotti, A., & Steemers, K. (Eds.) (1993). Daylighting in Architecture. London: James and James.
Bakker, L.G., Hoes-van Oeffelen, E.C.M., Loonen, R.C.G.M., & Hensen, J.L.M., (2014). User satisfaction and
interaction with Automated Dynamic Facades: A Pilot Study. Building and Environment, 78, 44-52.
Beltran, O. L., & Lee, S. E. (1994). The Design and Evaluation of Three Advanced Daylighting System, Solar
Golden Opportunities for Solar Prosperity, San Jose, California.
Beltran, L.O., Lee, E.S., & Selkowitz, S.E. (1996). Advanced Optical Daylighting Systems: Light Shelves and
Light Pipes, Illuminating Engineering Society. Berkley, CA, 92.
Beltran, O. L. (2008). Uppadhyaya, Kapil, Displacing Electric Lighting with Optical Daylighting Systems. 25th
Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin.
Boubekri, M., Yin, Z., & Guy, R. (1997). A Neural Network Solution to an Architectural Design. Architectural
Science Review, 40, 17-21.
Light Shelves in Buildings Problem: Design of a Light Shelf, Architectural Science Review, 40(1) 17-21.
Brotas, L., & Rusovan, D. (2013). Parametric Daylight Envelope, 29th Conference of Sustainable Architecture for
a Renewable Future. Munich, Germany.
Shelf Performance in Madrid for Hours with Unit Sunshine Fraction, Building and Environment, (37) 587–598.
Claros, S. & Solera, A. (2002). Indoor Daylight Climate Comparison between Light Shelves and Overhang Per-
Solar
Energy, 71(4), 233-239.
Daich, S., Noureddine, Z., & Yacine, S.M. (2013) A Study of Optimization of the Light Shelf System in Hot and
Arid Zones. American Solar Energy Conference.
Daum, D. (2011), On the Adaptation of Building Controls to the Envelope and the Occupant. Switzerland: Ecole
Polytechnique University.
Dowlatabadi, M. (2013). Energy Consumption Optimization Using Daylight in Educational Classrooms. Master
of Science in architecture. M.Sc. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University.
Eckerlin, H., & Atre, U. (2007). A New Daylighting Strategy for a Middle School in North Carolina, Innovative
Design Inc.
Edmonds I.R., & Greenup, P.J. (2003). Daylighting in the Tropics. Solar Energy, 73, 111–121.
Evanz, H.B. (1981). Daylight in Architecture. (Sh. Pourdehimi, & H. Adl Tabatabayi, Trans.) Tehran: Nokhostin.
Fanchiotti, A., & Amorim, C. (2001). Daylighting in Commercial Buildings: The Use of New Components and
Janeiro, Brazil.
Faizi, F., Noorani, M., & Mahdavinejad, M. (2011). Propose a Kind of Optimal Intelligent Window in Tropical
Region with an Ability to Reduce the Input Light and Heat and Having Enough Visibility to Outside. 2011 International
Conference on Intelligent Building and Management, IACSIT Press, Singapore.
Floyd, D., & Parker, D. (1998). Daylighting: Measuring the Performance of Light Shelves and Occupant Controlled
Blinds on a Dimmed Lighting System, 11th Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid
Climates, Fort Worth, Texas.
Thermal Behavior, Conference Proceeding by ASHRAE.
Freewan, A. A., Shao. L., & Riffat, S. (2008). Optimizing Performance of the Lightshelf by Modifying Ceiling
Geometry in Highly Luminous Climate. Solar Energy, 82(4), 343-353.
Freewan. A.A. (2010). Maximizing the Lightshelf Performance by Interaction between Litshelf Geometries and a
Curved Ceiling. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(8), 1600-1604.
Building. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1888-1895.
Hirning. M., Hansen, G., & Bell, J. (2010). Theoretical Comparison of Innovative Window Daylighting Devices for
a Sub-tropical Climate Using Radiance. Institute for Energy, Congress Centre Messe Frankfurt.
Hu, J., Du, J., & Place, W. (2011). -
ings Using a Dynamic Method. World renewable energy congress, Sweden: Linkoping.
Hu, J. (2003). The Design and Assessment of Advanced Daylighting Systems Integrated with Typical Interior
Joarder, M.A.R. (2009). A Simulation Assessment of the Height of Lightshelves to Enhance Daylighting in Tropi-
Glasgow, Scotland, 920-927.
-
cy of Commercial Buildings. 9th International IBPSA Conference Montréal, Canada.
Kim, G., Lim, H.S., Lim, T.S., Schaefer, L., & Kim, J.T. (2012). Comparative Advantage of an Exterior Shading
Device in Thermal Performance for Residential Buildings. Energy and Environment, (46), 105-111.
Lee, H., Seo, J., & Kim, Y. (2014). A Study on Daylighting Performance Evaluation of Light Shelf based on the
Spatial Form of Inclined Ceiling. Smart Home, 8(4), 1-14.
Littlefair, P.J. (1995) Light Shelves: Computer Assessment of Daylighting Performance. Lighting Research and
Technology, 27(2), 79-91.
Loonen, R. (2010). Climate Adaptive Building Shells, What Can We Simulate?, M. Sc. thesis, university of technology,
Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Luke, A., & Nicholson, P.E. (2004). Integrating Sustainable Building Design and Construction Principles into
Engineering Technology and Construction Management Curricula, American Society for Engineering Education
(ASEE) Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
Mahdavinejad, M. (2004). Wisdom of Islamic Architecture: Recognition of Iranian Islamic Architecture Principles.
HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, (19), 57-66.
Mahdavinejad, M. (2005). Education of Architectural Criticism. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, (23), 69-76.
-
ni Wind-Towers. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, winter 2012, (48), 69-80.
Mahdavinejad, M. & Mashayekhy, M. (2011). The Principles of Architectural Design of Mosques with Particular
Reference to Socio-Cultural Activities. Armanshahr, 3(5), 65-78.
Mahdavinejad, M. & Nagahani, N. (2011). Expression of Motion Concept in Contemporary Architecture of Iran.
Journal of Studies in Iranian-Islamic City, 1(3), 21-34.
Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M. & Amini, M. (2013a). Presentation of the Models and Methods of Transformation
of Tehran to Educating City; With the Emphasis on International Basement and Pragmatism Program. Urban
Management, (31), 83-106.
Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M. & Khaksar, N. (2011). Architecture and Identity- Explanation of the Meaning of
Identity in Pre-Modern, Modern and Post-Modern Eras. Hoviateshahr, 4(7), 113-122.
Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M. & Molaee, M. (2012a). Architecture in Context: Inspiration of Conceptualism
in Design. Naqshejahan, 1(1), 21-34.
Mahdavinejad, M., Hamzenejad, M. & Kamyab, M. (2012b). Principles and Fundamentals of Design and Building
of Mosalas in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Journal of Studies on Iranian-Islamic City, 3(9), 37-47.
Mahdavinejad, M., Khabiri, S. & Maleki, K. (2013b). Principles and Criteria of Lighting Urban Squares; Case
Study: Tehran Square. Armanshahr, Special Issue of the 1st Iran Lighting Design Conference Selected Articles,
67-83.
Mahdavinejad, M., Matoor, S., & Fayaz, R. (2012e). Vertical Illuminance Measurement for Clear Skies in Tehran.
Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 4(8), 11-19
Mahdavinejad, M., Matoor, S., Feyzmand, N., & Doroodgar, A. (2012c). Horizontal Distribution of Illuminance
Applied Mechanics and Materials, (110-116), 72-76
Mahdavinejad, M., Siami Namin, M. & Abossedgh, V. (2013c). New Lighting Technologies in Contemporary Iranian
Architecture. Armanshahr, Special Issue of the 1st Iran Lighting Design Conference Selected Articles, 37-43.
Mahdavinejad, M. (2003). Islamic Art, Challenges with New Horizons and Contemporary Beliefs. HONAR-HAYE-
ZIBA, (12), 23-32.
Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M., & Mashayekhi, M. (2012d). Asbads; the Oldest Windmills of the World.
Naqshejahan, 2(1): 43-54.
Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M., & Matoor, S. (2013d). Estimation Performance of Horizontal Light Pipes in
Deep-Plan Buildings. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 17(4), 41-48.
Lighting Research and Technology, 46, 245-267.
Ochoa, C.E. & Capeluto, I.G. (2006). Evaluating Visual Comfort and Performance of Three Natural Lighting
Building and Environment, (41), 1128–1135.
Oteiza, P., Orozco, S., Perez, M., Bedoya, C., & Neila, J. (2011). Optimized Modular Window as a Sustainable and
Industrialized Solution for Indoor Daylighting, World Renewable Energy Congress, Sweden: Linkoping.
Perez, M., Oteiza, P., & Neila., J. (2011). Fragmented Light Shelf: Sun Protection System and Daylighting Optimization.
28th Conference, Opportunities, Limits & Needs Towards an environmentally responsible architecture
Lima, Perú.
Raphael, B. (2011). Active Control of Daylighting Features in Buildings. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure
Engineering, (26), 393-405.
Raphael, B. (2014). Control of an Adaptive Light Shelf Using Multi Objective Optimization. 31st ISARC, Sydney,
Australia, 81-87.
Sabry, H., Sherif, A., & Gadelhak, M. (2012). Utilization of Combined Daylighting Techniques for Enhancement
of Natural Lighting Distribution in Clear-Sky Residential Desert Buildings. 28th Conference, Opportunities, Limits
& Needs Towards an environmentally responsible architecture Lima, Perú.
Schuman, J., Rubinstein, F., Papamichael, K., Beltran, L., Lee, E.S., & Selkowitz, S. (1992). Technology Reviews
Daylighting Optical Systems. AIIM, Maryland, 27-29.
Sethi, A. (2003). A Study of Daylighting Techniques and Their Energy Implications Using a Designer Friendly
Simulation Software. American Solar Energy Conference, Austin, TX.
Shikder, S.H., Mourshed, M., & Price, A.D.F. (2010). Optimization of a Daylight Window: Hospital Patient Room
as a Test Case, International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, England: Nottingham
University.
Silva Dr, F., Macedo Ms, C.C., Baracho Ms, A.S.B., Santana, M., & Lucio, P. (2003). Luminous Performance of
Direct Sunlighting Systems in Classrooms. The 20th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Santiago,
CHILE.
Soler, A., & Oteiza, P. (1995). A Comparison of the Daylighting Performance of Different Shading Devices Giving
the Same Solar Protection. Architectural Science Review, (38), 171-176.
Soler, A., & Oteiza, P. (1996). Dependence on Solar Elevation of the Performance of a Light Shelf as a Potential
Daylighting Device. Renewable Energy, (8), 198-201.
Soler, A., & Oteiza, P. (1997). Light Shelf Performance in Mardid. Spain. Building and Environment, 32(2), 87-93.
Warren, M., Selkowitz, S., Morse, O., Benton, C., & Jewell, J.E. (1988). Lighting System Performance in an
Innovative Daylighted Structure: an Instrumented Study Proc. 2nd Int. Daylighting Conf., Long Beach, 215-221.
Wu, W., & Ng, E. (2003). A Review of the Development of Daylighting in Schools. Lighting Research and Technology,
(35), 111-125.
Xue, P., Mak, C.M., & Cheung, H.D. (2014). New Static Lightshelf System Design of Clerestory Windows for
Hong Kong. Building and Environment, (72), 368-376.
Yener, K. A. (1999). A Method of Obtaining Visual Comfort Using Fixed Shading Devices in Rooms. Building
and Environment, (34), 285-291.